Posted by bad_luck on 10/17/2016 1:04:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 10/17/2016 12:03:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 10/17/2016 11:20:00 AM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 10/17/2016 11:05:00 AM (view original):

Posted by tecwrg on 10/17/2016 9:58:00 AM (view original):
And other than you're obvious hatred for Clinton, what in your opinion makes Trump a good candidate for President?

I'm following ABC (Anybody But Clinton) politics. Hell, I even voted for Socialist Sanders in the primary (closed State). I'm not the one continuing to act like "my" candidate is actually good. What part of "two worst candidates ever" (which I have said many time in several threads) is confusing?

Clinton certainly isn't perfect, but she's a far better option than Trump.

Not really. And, obviously, since you won't take a bet that she beats Trump by 192+, the country doesn't see her as "far better". But, as someone who admitted he never voted Republican beyond local elections, I can understand why you think that.

There's definitely a chance she wins by 192, but I think 144 is much more likely.

As someone who constantly rails on the stupidity of the masses, you shouldn't be surprised that a significant portion of the electorate sees Trump as a good choice.

The stupidity of the masses are also lapping up the bullshit Hillary is selling. She's not a "far better" option. She's part of the problem we have. Career politician. Can anyone remember when she wasn't in politics? The fact that even you have said that anyone but Trump could probably beat her indicates that you really don't think that much of her. She's terrible. She just happens to be less terrible than her opponent.

Here's the other thing that really bothers me about a potential Clinton presidency:

1980-1988 - Bush Sr. is VPOTUS
1988-1992 - Bush Sr is POTUS
1992-2000 - BClinton is POTUS
2000-2008 - Bush Jr. is POTUS
2008-2012 - HClinton is SoS
2012-2016 - temporary relief from the the Bush/Clinton rotating oligarchy
2016-2020/2024 - HClinton is POTUS

So for either 36 out of 40 years, or possibly 40 out of 44 years, one of the three highest offices in government is held by either a Bush or a Clinton.

That can never be seen as a good thing.

Posted by MikeT23 on 10/17/2016 2:40:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 10/17/2016 1:04:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 10/17/2016 12:03:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 10/17/2016 11:20:00 AM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 10/17/2016 11:05:00 AM (view original):

Posted by tecwrg on 10/17/2016 9:58:00 AM (view original):
And other than you're obvious hatred for Clinton, what in your opinion makes Trump a good candidate for President?

I'm following ABC (Anybody But Clinton) politics. Hell, I even voted for Socialist Sanders in the primary (closed State). I'm not the one continuing to act like "my" candidate is actually good. What part of "two worst candidates ever" (which I have said many time in several threads) is confusing?

Clinton certainly isn't perfect, but she's a far better option than Trump.

Not really. And, obviously, since you won't take a bet that she beats Trump by 192+, the country doesn't see her as "far better". But, as someone who admitted he never voted Republican beyond local elections, I can understand why you think that.

There's definitely a chance she wins by 192, but I think 144 is much more likely.

As someone who constantly rails on the stupidity of the masses, you shouldn't be surprised that a significant portion of the electorate sees Trump as a good choice.

The stupidity of the masses are also lapping up the bullshit Hillary is selling. She's not a "far better" option. She's part of the problem we have. Career politician. Can anyone remember when she wasn't in politics? The fact that even you have said that anyone but Trump could probably beat her indicates that you really don't think that much of her. She's terrible. She just happens to be less terrible than her opponent.

Career politician, as unappealing as that is, is still a far better option than an immature narcissist with thin skin and zero self awareness.

I think Clinton is a weak candidate. That's different than how I think she'll do in office.

Posted by bad_luck on 10/17/2016 2:12:00 PM (view original):
All3, I didn't realize you'd asked me a question.

Clinton is better primarily because she has relevant experience. There is no doubt that she has the ability and temperament to run the country. There is significant doubt that Trump does.

Does experience f*cking things up , really make her a better candidate? What ability to run the Country do you know about that nobody else does? Because she hides her emotions better in public means she's going to make better decisions? She's going to put more qualified people in leadership positions instead of the same old do-nothings / fellow f*ck-ups? Sorry, I'm not buying any of that. Sadly so many like you are.

Posted by all3 on 10/17/2016 3:20:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 10/17/2016 2:12:00 PM (view original):
All3, I didn't realize you'd asked me a question.

Clinton is better primarily because she has relevant experience. There is no doubt that she has the ability and temperament to run the country. There is significant doubt that Trump does.

Does experience f*cking things up , really make her a better candidate? What ability to run the Country do you know about that nobody else does? Because she hides her emotions better in public means she's going to make better decisions? She's going to put more qualified people in leadership positions instead of the same old do-nothings / fellow f*ck-ups? Sorry, I'm not buying any of that. Sadly so many like you are.

What is Trump going to do?

Posted by tecwrg on 10/17/2016 3:22:00 PM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 10/17/2016 3:20:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 10/17/2016 2:12:00 PM (view original):
All3, I didn't realize you'd asked me a question.

Clinton is better primarily because she has relevant experience. There is no doubt that she has the ability and temperament to run the country. There is significant doubt that Trump does.

Does experience f*cking things up , really make her a better candidate? What ability to run the Country do you know about that nobody else does? Because she hides her emotions better in public means she's going to make better decisions? She's going to put more qualified people in leadership positions instead of the same old do-nothings / fellow f*ck-ups? Sorry, I'm not buying any of that. Sadly so many like you are.

What is Trump going to do?

The same thing he's done for decades - put people who know what they are doing in charge of things. I have infinitely more trust in him doing that than I do in her.

Posted by all3 on 10/17/2016 3:38:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tecwrg on 10/17/2016 3:22:00 PM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 10/17/2016 3:20:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 10/17/2016 2:12:00 PM (view original):
All3, I didn't realize you'd asked me a question.

Clinton is better primarily because she has relevant experience. There is no doubt that she has the ability and temperament to run the country. There is significant doubt that Trump does.

Does experience f*cking things up , really make her a better candidate? What ability to run the Country do you know about that nobody else does? Because she hides her emotions better in public means she's going to make better decisions? She's going to put more qualified people in leadership positions instead of the same old do-nothings / fellow f*ck-ups? Sorry, I'm not buying any of that. Sadly so many like you are.

What is Trump going to do?

The same thing he's done for decades - put people who know what they are doing in charge of things. I have infinitely more trust in him doing that than I do in her.

Like how he put smart people in charge of his campaign and listened to them?

Your view on Trump is a myth. He would do exactly as he has always done. Surround himself with yes-men and make decisions on the fly. Except now, instead of just ruining casinos and stiffing small businesses, he'd wreck the country.

But his view on Hillary is dead on.

ALL OF YOU PALEFACED EUROPEAN TERRORIST SCUM NEEDS TO LEAVE THIS ONCE BEAUTIFUL LAND!

HOKA HEY HOKE HEY!!!! LET'S TAKE SOME SCALPS, TONTO!!!!!

Posted by bad_luck on 10/17/2016 3:58:00 PM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 10/17/2016 3:38:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tecwrg on 10/17/2016 3:22:00 PM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 10/17/2016 3:20:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 10/17/2016 2:12:00 PM (view original):
All3, I didn't realize you'd asked me a question.

Clinton is better primarily because she has relevant experience. There is no doubt that she has the ability and temperament to run the country. There is significant doubt that Trump does.

Does experience f*cking things up , really make her a better candidate? What ability to run the Country do you know about that nobody else does? Because she hides her emotions better in public means she's going to make better decisions? She's going to put more qualified people in leadership positions instead of the same old do-nothings / fellow f*ck-ups? Sorry, I'm not buying any of that. Sadly so many like you are.

What is Trump going to do?

The same thing he's done for decades - put people who know what they are doing in charge of things. I have infinitely more trust in him doing that than I do in her.

Like how he put smart people in charge of his campaign and listened to them?

Your view on Trump is a myth. He would do exactly as he has always done. Surround himself with yes-men and make decisions on the fly. Except now, instead of just ruining casinos and stiffing small businesses, he'd wreck the country.

What has Trump done particularly well? Besides **** up Atlantic City

He's been a pretty solid ***** grabber.

Tell the truth Mike, you are going to vote for Trump, You are so much alike there is no way you would not