Posted by wylie715 on 7/18/2018 1:51:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 12:04:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 11:58:00 AM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 11:55:00 AM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 11:50:00 AM (view original):
The term senior citizen is, though. Same with young adult, middle aged, etc. Even “adult/child” differs depending on the context.

There are many articles that show that age and race are social constructs. Sorry. You cannot pick and choose what is and is not a social construct.

I don't even care that much because I won't change your mind and you will not change mine. What matters to me is that you acknowledge this EXACT fact. The country is divided because of such debates. We cannot even agree what is a man and what is a woman.

No, I’m pretty sure I can change your mind.

I am pretty sure in an MMA match you would submit in less than one minute to me. Opinions vary.

who the hell cares?

Posted by wylie715 on 7/18/2018 1:45:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 10:14:00 AM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 7/16/2018 10:04:00 AM (view original):
I just can't bring myself to read the last few pages of this lunacy. Did b_l ever even attempt to answer:
1) If a person can "relate" to a different gender on different days, why can't they "relate" to a different age?
2) If they can relate to a different gender, why can't they relate to a different species? (Are either of these "crazier" now than homosexuality and transgender where a few decades ago?)
3) Why shouldn't a person having a "relation" day use the restroom their body parts dictate and feel a bit uncomfortable themselves instead of causing others discomfort?
If so, or if he ever does (both very, very, very unlikely), would somebody please let me know. Maybe he'll take a World-wide poll first, since we know he loves his polls and believes they are never wrong. I'd be LMAO at this idiot if it wasn't both so infuriating and yet so sad that people actually think like him.

#1) BL does not answer questions that do not promote his agenda. He should be in politics.
#2) They can but it does not fit his narrative so he does not answer.
#3) Because that is how Leftists think.

That is not how all leftist think. I know you consider me a leftist and you know I agree with you on this issue. That's part of the problem with the divide in the country. People will think, oh you're a conservative or a liberal. I disagree with everything you believe. That's not the case. I know there are different subjects I agree with cccp. strikeout and others most would probably consider conservatives here and other subjects I disagree with tangplay, BL, laamiebob and the Taint on here (except maybe moy...think I may disagree with everything he says). If we are willing to accept that we all have different beliefs and opinions and some we may agree with and some we won't agree with, we'd get a long better.

Posted by skinndogg on 7/18/2018 1:37:00 PM (view original):

I didn't vote for Trump in the primary. But I did vote for him November of 2016 because the alternative choice was unthinkable for me. And I still don't think Trump's temperament is best for all situations.

But he is a better President than I thought he would ever be. Why?

Because he Fights.

Unlike all the recent past Republican leaders Bush, McCain, Romney (who let Candy Crowley kick his butt), he fights the Democratic Party's power in the media. He doesn't just rollover and accept the media's narrative.

He fights and stands up for Conservative principles. Finally, somebody who fights.

I'm more supportive of him now than ever before, and the more the Left and media squeals about todays current make believe outrage, the more I support him.

He is going to win easily in 2020.

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/18/2018 1:46:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 7/18/2018 1:32:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/18/2018 9:23:00 AM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 7/18/2018 1:06:00 AM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/18/2018 12:33:00 AM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 7/17/2018 11:24:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/17/2018 11:02:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 7/17/2018 10:42:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/17/2018 9:18:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 7/17/2018 9:12:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/17/2018 8:49:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 7/17/2018 8:45:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/17/2018 8:35:00 PM (view original):

Posted by DoctorKz on 7/17/2018 8:09:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 7/17/2018 7:57:00 PM (view original):

Posted by DoctorKz on 7/17/2018 7:54:00 PM (view original):
Who knows what Trump and Putin's conversation was like. Putin, like Little Rocket Man, wants an audience, legitimacy, the means to make propaganda. So maybe Donald says I make nice for you in front of the cameras, in exchange for a toning down in Syria, or perhaps help on the world's stage to get NK to straighten up and fly right. The media will eat me alive, but they hate me anyway. I take the heat, so what? Perhaps better than escalating tensions between Washington and Moscow. Trump knows Putin is gonna work in the shadows, he's KGB. Why fan the flames? Perhaps Donald cut a better deal than we know...then again, perhaps he's a patsy...

LOL...you really think Donald could cut a killer deal and keep it quiet? Hell no.

Compared to the guy he replaced, yes...like I said, who knows? Surely he didn't go into that meeting to come out embarrassed. But go ahead, underestimate him. Again...

I deal with people I don’t necessarily like frequently as part of my job but in negotiations you sometimes have to eat it for the greater good.

I agree with Doc. No reason to anger Russia. We need all the allies we can get when dealing with Radical Islam.

If you think Putin is less of a threat than radical Islam you are the biggest moron on this forum. This may have been the dumbest thing you have ever said on this thread and that's saying something.

I 100% think so. When has Putin attacked us? Radical Islam caused 9/11, deaths in Afghanistan and Iraq. To me that is the biggest threat. And like bad luck you would never say that to my face, you are a coward. In terms of espionage and such, China is a bigger threat than Russia as well.

Thank you for making my point yet again that my 14 year old is smarter than you.

He meddled with our election?

Radical islam isn't equal to terrorism. Terrorists are one small branch on the radical islam tree. And those wars in Iraq and Afghanistan went real well didn't they? You cannot fight an idea.

Putin's Russia is directly at odds with American interests. He is trying to tear our country down. Additionally, he has a very corrupt government where rivals get killed.

How would you fight radical islam?

What was that virgin? Sorry, I missed that.

You are a coward, who is all for football players kneeling during the anthem and you argued that the US and the USSR were NOT allies in WWII. You are a moron. Radical Islam wants to wipe the US off the face of the Earth as do its people. You think Putin and the Russian people want to wipe the US off the face of the Earth? Dummy.

Radical Islam is 100x the bigger threat.

How would I fight it? I would firstly admit it exists. Something you refuse to do. You say small branch. If it is 1% and we know it is a lot more than that so it is 16 million terrorists. In the world right now there are about 16 million Jews in TOTAL.

More non-sequiturs. Radical Islam is not the bigger threat, lol.

You still think that terrorism and radical islam are the same thing. it isn't. More than 1% of Islamists are radical. But even Ben Shapiro says that less than 1% are terrorists.

But OK. Admit it exists. Radical Islam exists. You are the US president (shudder). What now.

No he doesn’t and if you re radical you re one step from killing and I d rather be proactive than reactive

Yes. He does. When you were proving your point about this in a very early discussion of ours you showed me a video where he said that very thing.

OK so your plan is to kill every single radical Islamist. Let's assume that you know exactly who is radical. So how do you achieve this? Do you go to war with every country that has a radical in it? How do we go about removing radical Islam.

Re watch the video. That is not what he says.

Give me a link back to the video in question.

From what I recall Shapiro is listing off the numbers of radicals in each country and then he says something along the lines of 'Now, radical islam is not the same thing as terrorism and if you argue otherwise you are either ignorant or uniformed.'

Just think logically about this. There are millions of radical Islamists. Let's say 16 million, like you said. 1% of 16 million is 160,000. Are there 160,000 terrorists in the world? Is there 160,000 terrorist acts every year? There were 1000 terrorist attacks last year. How does this logic make any sense?

Find it yourself. Geez.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g7TAAw3oQvg

This video at the 1:17 mark.

Radical beliefs are a lot broader than terrorists and anybody who argues otherwise is being naive or foolish or disingenuous. But, terrorists draw their moral and religious support from those who are not terrorists themselves.

You cannot use the terms 'radical Islam' and 'terrorism' interchangeably. Even Ben Shapiro agrees with that statement. And we all know that his word is the bible.

That is not what he is saying. To me in MY OPINION there is a thin line between a radical and a terrorist. I'd rather be proactive and get rid of the radical before they make a final step and become a terrorist.

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 2:52:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 7/16/2018 2:48:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 2:33:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 7/16/2018 2:28:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 2:04:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 7/16/2018 2:01:00 PM (view original):
Obviously a ton of people thought it was going to influence something.....people that do this **** for a living. Whatever the reason, it's against the law.

I get it. I am just curious as to how? I logically cannot see it. I must know more!!!

Obviously the targets would be swing states. Maybe someone can write a book about it sometime? Derschewitz (sp??) thinks that this is not impeachable. IDK.

I do know this. Whatever Mueller comes back with, 50% of the country will like and 50% will hate.

But you will respect Mueller's authority on this, no? I just want to make that clear so there are no backsies when he releases his report.

How can I respect something I have yet to read. After the Stztrok (sp?) testimony I honestly no longer trust Washington or the FBI. Do you buy that he was unbiased? Things are so heated now I don't think anyone is unbiased.

If Mueller finds nothing then I probably won't believe him. If he finds that Trump and Putin are lovers, I will. No one would make that up, LOL.

As a sidebar. I thought that report on deflating footballs and TB was total BS. So I am a skeptic. I actually think Trump has been tougher on Russia than Obama was. He killed 200+ mercenaries in Syria, he armed Ukraine, he imposed sanctions on Iran, he is pushing on China and N. Korea. Why would Russia want him over HRC? Maybe to divide the country? I don't get it.

Mueller is biased. Everyone is. He also happens to be a conservative. And he is a good, honest man.

You don't know Mueller. You have no idea if he is good or honest. I am sure in 1985 they said the same thing about Bill Cosby. Conservatives are not Trump supporters necessarily. Not everyone is biased but most people are for sure. If that Stzork thing did not irritate you then you are not human.

Posted by laramiebob on 7/18/2018 2:02:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/18/2018 1:46:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 7/18/2018 1:32:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/18/2018 9:23:00 AM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 7/18/2018 1:06:00 AM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/18/2018 12:33:00 AM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 7/17/2018 11:24:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/17/2018 11:02:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 7/17/2018 10:42:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/17/2018 9:18:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 7/17/2018 9:12:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/17/2018 8:49:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 7/17/2018 8:45:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/17/2018 8:35:00 PM (view original):

Posted by DoctorKz on 7/17/2018 8:09:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 7/17/2018 7:57:00 PM (view original):

Posted by DoctorKz on 7/17/2018 7:54:00 PM (view original):
Who knows what Trump and Putin's conversation was like. Putin, like Little Rocket Man, wants an audience, legitimacy, the means to make propaganda. So maybe Donald says I make nice for you in front of the cameras, in exchange for a toning down in Syria, or perhaps help on the world's stage to get NK to straighten up and fly right. The media will eat me alive, but they hate me anyway. I take the heat, so what? Perhaps better than escalating tensions between Washington and Moscow. Trump knows Putin is gonna work in the shadows, he's KGB. Why fan the flames? Perhaps Donald cut a better deal than we know...then again, perhaps he's a patsy...

LOL...you really think Donald could cut a killer deal and keep it quiet? Hell no.

Compared to the guy he replaced, yes...like I said, who knows? Surely he didn't go into that meeting to come out embarrassed. But go ahead, underestimate him. Again...

I deal with people I don’t necessarily like frequently as part of my job but in negotiations you sometimes have to eat it for the greater good.

I agree with Doc. No reason to anger Russia. We need all the allies we can get when dealing with Radical Islam.

If you think Putin is less of a threat than radical Islam you are the biggest moron on this forum. This may have been the dumbest thing you have ever said on this thread and that's saying something.

I 100% think so. When has Putin attacked us? Radical Islam caused 9/11, deaths in Afghanistan and Iraq. To me that is the biggest threat. And like bad luck you would never say that to my face, you are a coward. In terms of espionage and such, China is a bigger threat than Russia as well.

Thank you for making my point yet again that my 14 year old is smarter than you.

He meddled with our election?

Radical islam isn't equal to terrorism. Terrorists are one small branch on the radical islam tree. And those wars in Iraq and Afghanistan went real well didn't they? You cannot fight an idea.

Putin's Russia is directly at odds with American interests. He is trying to tear our country down. Additionally, he has a very corrupt government where rivals get killed.

How would you fight radical islam?

What was that virgin? Sorry, I missed that.

You are a coward, who is all for football players kneeling during the anthem and you argued that the US and the USSR were NOT allies in WWII. You are a moron. Radical Islam wants to wipe the US off the face of the Earth as do its people. You think Putin and the Russian people want to wipe the US off the face of the Earth? Dummy.

Radical Islam is 100x the bigger threat.

How would I fight it? I would firstly admit it exists. Something you refuse to do. You say small branch. If it is 1% and we know it is a lot more than that so it is 16 million terrorists. In the world right now there are about 16 million Jews in TOTAL.

More non-sequiturs. Radical Islam is not the bigger threat, lol.

You still think that terrorism and radical islam are the same thing. it isn't. More than 1% of Islamists are radical. But even Ben Shapiro says that less than 1% are terrorists.

But OK. Admit it exists. Radical Islam exists. You are the US president (shudder). What now.

No he doesn’t and if you re radical you re one step from killing and I d rather be proactive than reactive

Yes. He does. When you were proving your point about this in a very early discussion of ours you showed me a video where he said that very thing.

OK so your plan is to kill every single radical Islamist. Let's assume that you know exactly who is radical. So how do you achieve this? Do you go to war with every country that has a radical in it? How do we go about removing radical Islam.

Re watch the video. That is not what he says.

Give me a link back to the video in question.

From what I recall Shapiro is listing off the numbers of radicals in each country and then he says something along the lines of 'Now, radical islam is not the same thing as terrorism and if you argue otherwise you are either ignorant or uniformed.'

Just think logically about this. There are millions of radical Islamists. Let's say 16 million, like you said. 1% of 16 million is 160,000. Are there 160,000 terrorists in the world? Is there 160,000 terrorist acts every year? There were 1000 terrorist attacks last year. How does this logic make any sense?

Find it yourself. Geez.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g7TAAw3oQvg

This video at the 1:17 mark.

Radical beliefs are a lot broader than terrorists and anybody who argues otherwise is being naive or foolish or disingenuous. But, terrorists draw their moral and religious support from those who are not terrorists themselves.

You cannot use the terms 'radical Islam' and 'terrorism' interchangeably. Even Ben Shapiro agrees with that statement. And we all know that his word is the bible.

That is not what he is saying. To me in MY OPINION there is a thin line between a radical and a terrorist. I'd rather be proactive and get rid of the radical before they make a final step and become a terrorist.

Boris. Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, Patrick Henry, Bostonians Samuel and John Adams, Hancock, Franklin, and ALL the rest of the "signers" gave proof that they were "radicals". When they picked up arms to defend their freedom against King George he damn sure thought of them as terrorists!!!

I know 100's of RADICAL believers of many stripes.
Personally I think they're all nuts. Their God's "on the nod".
BUT, in this Country they can be as radically nuts as they want to be IF it is their religious belief.
That is, unless the Gov't decides it wants to take away your tax free status-------- then you must change your (stated) beliefs......... ask any good Mormon.

Posted by wylie715 on 7/18/2018 2:01:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 2:52:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 7/16/2018 2:48:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 2:33:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 7/16/2018 2:28:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 2:04:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 7/16/2018 2:01:00 PM (view original):
Obviously a ton of people thought it was going to influence something.....people that do this **** for a living. Whatever the reason, it's against the law.

I get it. I am just curious as to how? I logically cannot see it. I must know more!!!

Obviously the targets would be swing states. Maybe someone can write a book about it sometime? Derschewitz (sp??) thinks that this is not impeachable. IDK.

I do know this. Whatever Mueller comes back with, 50% of the country will like and 50% will hate.

But you will respect Mueller's authority on this, no? I just want to make that clear so there are no backsies when he releases his report.

How can I respect something I have yet to read. After the Stztrok (sp?) testimony I honestly no longer trust Washington or the FBI. Do you buy that he was unbiased? Things are so heated now I don't think anyone is unbiased.

If Mueller finds nothing then I probably won't believe him. If he finds that Trump and Putin are lovers, I will. No one would make that up, LOL.

As a sidebar. I thought that report on deflating footballs and TB was total BS. So I am a skeptic. I actually think Trump has been tougher on Russia than Obama was. He killed 200+ mercenaries in Syria, he armed Ukraine, he imposed sanctions on Iran, he is pushing on China and N. Korea. Why would Russia want him over HRC? Maybe to divide the country? I don't get it.

Mueller is biased. Everyone is. He also happens to be a conservative. And he is a good, honest man.

You don't know Mueller. You have no idea if he is good or honest. I am sure in 1985 they said the same thing about Bill Cosby. Conservatives are not Trump supporters necessarily. Not everyone is biased but most people are for sure. If that Stzork thing did not irritate you then you are not human.

I agree about Mueller. I don't know him. He may be a good person. He may be honest. He may not.
However I do disagree with cccp about not everyone being biased. Everyone has biases. Everyone.

Posted by strikeout26 on 7/16/2018 7:07:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 12:25:00 PM (view original):
Your opinion is irrelevant just as mine was when I didn't have kids. I realized that quickly after I had them. Of course in the end they will date whomever they want but generally girls gravitate toward dating people who closest resemble how their dads acted and such. Look it up.

Boys are more of rebels. I was too. I know.

My daughter may date when I'm dead and gone, not a second before.

Posted by wylie715 on 7/18/2018 1:47:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 11:24:00 AM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/15/2018 10:57:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/15/2018 10:35:00 PM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 7/15/2018 10:33:00 PM (view original):
I did answer. You didn't like my answer.

I'll answer again. It's inappropriate and opens doors to harassment and abuse. I feel like you are ignoring common sense to fight a political cause.

Common sense tells me that people tend not to get in other people’s in-stall bathroom business. Whether or not one person in a stall has a dick doesn’t seem to matter.

Your problem is utterly dismissing my concerns. That makes you an a hole. I don’t feel comfortable with my 12 and 14 year old girls sharing a locker room with a person who was born a male and still has male parts.

The fact that you laugh at that is interesting. I also told you my girls would not feel comfortable with such a situation. You dismissed that too.

Fine. What Planet Fitness must do is disclose in their membership agreement that people with penises may use the W locker room. See how many members they have left....

Allow Capitalism to decide.

But again that’s not my primary issue. My main issue is that Leftists dismiss other people’s opinions and label them as racists, bigots, sexist, etc.

Lefitsts are illogical. Bad luck is illogical. I truly hope Trump wins again.

No can do anything about your concerns. We can’t change laws every time an individual feels uncomfortable about something. If you can’t handle the fact that a transgender woman might be in the bathroom at the same time as your daughter, don’t let your daughter go to the bathroom in public. Or pick a restroom that is a one person at a time.

you never answered my question. why is the man who identifies as a woman's comfort more important than the comfort of the women he makes feel uncomfortable by being in the women's locker room?

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/17/2018 9:40:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 7/17/2018 9:36:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/17/2018 9:30:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 7/17/2018 9:29:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/17/2018 9:23:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/17/2018 9:13:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 7/17/2018 9:10:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/17/2018 9:06:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 7/17/2018 9:04:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/17/2018 8:55:00 PM (view original):
https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/13/opinions/strzok-hearing-bias-opinion-callan/index.html



Here it is again so that Tang can learn to read. From CNN...not exactly a DJT supportive site.




Some may assume that if Strzok really wanted to sabotage the election of Trump all he had to do was leak the fact that the FBI was investigating Trump. But that logic doesn't fly. Strzok would have feared loss of his job or possible criminal prosecution for such a leak -- particularly if classified information were involved. The true test of Strzok's biases and intentions can be found in his malicious text messages.

His text messages are just that, text messages. For someone hellbent on destroying Trump, he sure was kinda a ***** about it if he was fearful for his job.

We agree. He is a sissy boy.

Let me ask you this Taint. You are about to play a hoops game against another team and I am your ref. I walk over to you and say, man you guys should lose 100-0 and you are all losers and then laugh. Do you think I will be an unbiased ref?

Honestly.

I don't know. You said earlier this week you could be unbiased in the work you do for clients even when you don't like them. I'm certainly capable of it. What makes you think he can't either?

Answer my question please. Yes or No. If you had to bet your life would you say I would be unbiased.

To answer you. I don't text fellow bankers stating how I wish these clients would go bankrupt. I also told you that I have a higher moral compass than Petey. I would never cheat on my wife and embarrass her the way he did. If he lied to his wife he can lie to Congress and the American People.

Taint? Where is my answer....Yes or No. Don't wuss out and say IDK.

It's a dumb hypothetical.

The ref isn't going to play the game for us. Just because you may be biased doesn't mean what you say is going to come true.

No but say some fans hear that. Don't you think their perception will be that the ref is biased?

Sure.

PS had people under him and over him scrutinizing his work constantly. If he was so afraid to lose his job, he wouldn't have fudged anything. It's all in his testimony. You should watch it.

I actually don't have issue with him texting and such. My issue is him lying to Congress about his bias and looking like a smug A hole. Everyone has bias. In this debate you and I have bias. You are not human if you don't have bias. The country is so polarized we can't even have a civil debate. Your *** hole friends, Tang and bad luck cower and won't even state why they think Jason Whitlock is an idiot.

I stated why I think Kellerman is.

In the end it doesn't matter. People have their minds made up and only see what they want to see.

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/18/2018 1:55:00 PM (view original):

Posted by wylie715 on 7/18/2018 1:51:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 12:04:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 11:58:00 AM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 11:55:00 AM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 11:50:00 AM (view original):
The term senior citizen is, though. Same with young adult, middle aged, etc. Even “adult/child” differs depending on the context.

There are many articles that show that age and race are social constructs. Sorry. You cannot pick and choose what is and is not a social construct.

I don't even care that much because I won't change your mind and you will not change mine. What matters to me is that you acknowledge this EXACT fact. The country is divided because of such debates. We cannot even agree what is a man and what is a woman.

No, I’m pretty sure I can change your mind.

I am pretty sure in an MMA match you would submit in less than one minute to me. Opinions vary.

who the hell cares?

That post was to show how outrageous his post was.

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/18/2018 1:58:00 PM (view original):

Posted by wylie715 on 7/18/2018 1:45:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 10:14:00 AM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 7/16/2018 10:04:00 AM (view original):
I just can't bring myself to read the last few pages of this lunacy. Did b_l ever even attempt to answer:
1) If a person can "relate" to a different gender on different days, why can't they "relate" to a different age?
2) If they can relate to a different gender, why can't they relate to a different species? (Are either of these "crazier" now than homosexuality and transgender where a few decades ago?)
3) Why shouldn't a person having a "relation" day use the restroom their body parts dictate and feel a bit uncomfortable themselves instead of causing others discomfort?
If so, or if he ever does (both very, very, very unlikely), would somebody please let me know. Maybe he'll take a World-wide poll first, since we know he loves his polls and believes they are never wrong. I'd be LMAO at this idiot if it wasn't both so infuriating and yet so sad that people actually think like him.

#1) BL does not answer questions that do not promote his agenda. He should be in politics.
#2) They can but it does not fit his narrative so he does not answer.
#3) Because that is how Leftists think.

That is not how all leftist think. I know you consider me a leftist and you know I agree with you on this issue. That's part of the problem with the divide in the country. People will think, oh you're a conservative or a liberal. I disagree with everything you believe. That's not the case. I know there are different subjects I agree with cccp. strikeout and others most would probably consider conservatives here and other subjects I disagree with tangplay, BL, laamiebob and the Taint on here (except maybe moy...think I may disagree with everything he says). If we are willing to accept that we all have different beliefs and opinions and some we may agree with and some we won't agree with, we'd get a long better.

You are not a leftist. You're a logical human being and overall seem like a good dude. We don't have to agree on everything.