Posted by cccp1014 on 12/18/2018 3:00:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 12/18/2018 1:23:00 PM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 12/18/2018 10:27:00 AM (view original):
Posted by tangplay on 12/18/2018 10:17:00 AM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 12/18/2018 10:11:00 AM (view original):
Posted by tangplay on 12/18/2018 8:55:00 AM (view original):
You don't know that many people.
From my poker nights, work events, family functions, well over 200 opinions.
Assuming you know 200 people that voted, you know .000001% of the voting pool in 2016.
Yes and? You don’t think 200+ persons is a significant sample? When they do polling what % of persons/voters do you think they poll? Can you name one person who was on the fence and was swayed by ads? I have yet to encounter one anywhere.
So you're saying that political ads don't sway voters?
They do if candidates are unknown but in the case of DJT and HRC, no I don't believe they did.
I don't think that's true.
Sure, for someone like you or me, someone who resides firmly in one part of the political spectrum and keeps up with politics, a thousand ads won't do anything. But the vast majority of the population isn't in that group.
A lot of people, a huge amount of people, don't follow politics particularly closely. They might have a vague idea that they are going to vote for someone but the right ad, with the right message, could be enough to convince them to stay home on election day.
I personally know people, mostly lifelong registered republicans or independents, who were planning to hold their nose and vote for Clinton in 2016. Then Comey held the press conference announcing that they were re-opening the investigation into the emails and a lot of those people ended up not voting. That's not an ad, but it's an example of a group of voters being swayed away from a candidate based on one message.