Late add to the above because he posted the pick after it but.... man oh man I love mikee's start with Hardaway, Rodman and Stoudemire. Stoudemire and Rodman is a great pairing.

Robusk: I'm using the 68-69 Russell season with the 90 d rating so I have by your 19400 min metric 19.6m to draft my remaining 9727 minutes - I think this may be different than your assumption? fwiw I think I'm actually closer to $165k so still pretty low on the board

Posted by copernicus on 6/23/2019 4:38:00 PM (view original):
Robusk: I'm using the 68-69 Russell season with the 90 d rating so I have by your 19400 min metric 19.6m to draft my remaining 9727 minutes - I think this may be different than your assumption? fwiw I think I'm actually closer to $165k so still pretty low on the board

I find it hard to pick a best season of his because so many are similar. I think I prefer the 59-60 version. Better rebounding, better TO%, better shooting, less fouls. But also worse defense, more expensive, worse passing, worse shot distribution.

I think at 7.6m for 3200+ minutes of 90 D and 12/26 creb the 68-69 season is pretty cost effective which I need since my UNC connection duo cost 20m just by themselves

I would’ve been happy with (18-19) Gobert, Ben Simmons, Jokic as my 1/2/3 but I was able to trade down and pick Gobert, Jokic, and a falling Simmons 1/3/3 and turn my 5th into an extra 4th + move up both of my 6ths in the process. Fingers crossed that I don’t screw this up.

Posted by 24kpyrite on 6/18/2019 10:57:00 PM (view original):
I really hoped to be real time involved in commentary, but I leave for a bachelor party on Friday and I come back to an anniversary on Sunday. Since I am an early riser, no matter the physical/mental conditions, I will still try my best to update over the weekend. Since boss of the house has been out of town all week, I plan to avoid this devilish machine and get lucky on Sunday, but if you see me posting you know I failed. Anywho, cheers to all of your mistakes!

I loved this little peak into your life. Appreciate you doing these evals. I am enjoying them so far.

Posted by robusk on 6/23/2019 2:33:00 PM (view original):

Posted by jhsukow on 6/23/2019 2:23:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bds9992 on 6/23/2019 1:40:00 PM (view original):
I have Artis as a first round talent, so it was a no brainer for me. Good news is Nash and AD are cheap together

I was hoping someone with less free money would grab him.

I usually keep track of how much money each owner has remaining to fill out the rest of their need Min/82. It helps me keep track of where everyone else in the draft and prevents me from overvaluing teams that seem loaded but are short on cash. Obviously I can only go off of what I perceive to be each player's best season and I use 19,400 minutes as my baseline. That being said... as it stands now:

Row Labels	Count Plyers	Sum Min	$/Min Rem
tau1624	2	5,701	$ 190,000
redbooda	2	5,869	$ 189,675
Midge	2	4,298	$ 188,362
ysw128	2	5,699	$ 188,230
dBKC	2	4,615	$ 184,755
mikee1	2	6,316	$ 184,289
robusk	3	8,116	$ 182,368
benhoidal	2	4,833	$ 179,937
jcred5	2	5,902	$ 179,218
mptrey	2	5,244	$ 178,353
24kpyrite	2	6,015	$ 177,876
gerryred	2	5,942	$ 177,510
isacqbs58	2	5,687	$ 177,010
tarheel1991	3	7,690	$ 176,601
jackedjamie	2	6,787	$ 176,111
cjok1051	3	7,928	$ 174,965
6theluckyone	3	7,988	$ 173,709
jhsukow	3	8,587	$ 173,529
pharrop	3	8,590	$ 173,459
sappy	3	8,432	$ 171,906
dh555	2	6,155	$ 171,008
bds9992	3	8,947	$ 165,997
copernicus	3	9,822	$ 158,718
NotoriousJ	3	9,208	$ 156,950

very interesting - would need to spend some time analyzing that $/Min Rem number. Not sure what to make of it. I do use $ per minute as guideline for some things and when you factor usage it can be pretty interesting. But blended over 9 or 10 players harder to say.

I usually just ball park 2m per 1000 minutes

Posted by jcred5 on 6/24/2019 11:06:00 AM (view original):

Posted by robusk on 6/23/2019 2:33:00 PM (view original):

Posted by jhsukow on 6/23/2019 2:23:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bds9992 on 6/23/2019 1:40:00 PM (view original):
I have Artis as a first round talent, so it was a no brainer for me. Good news is Nash and AD are cheap together

I was hoping someone with less free money would grab him.

I usually keep track of how much money each owner has remaining to fill out the rest of their need Min/82. It helps me keep track of where everyone else in the draft and prevents me from overvaluing teams that seem loaded but are short on cash. Obviously I can only go off of what I perceive to be each player's best season and I use 19,400 minutes as my baseline. That being said... as it stands now:

Row Labels	Count Plyers	Sum Min	$/Min Rem
tau1624	2	5,701	$ 190,000
redbooda	2	5,869	$ 189,675
Midge	2	4,298	$ 188,362
ysw128	2	5,699	$ 188,230
dBKC	2	4,615	$ 184,755
mikee1	2	6,316	$ 184,289
robusk	3	8,116	$ 182,368
benhoidal	2	4,833	$ 179,937
jcred5	2	5,902	$ 179,218
mptrey	2	5,244	$ 178,353
24kpyrite	2	6,015	$ 177,876
gerryred	2	5,942	$ 177,510
isacqbs58	2	5,687	$ 177,010
tarheel1991	3	7,690	$ 176,601
jackedjamie	2	6,787	$ 176,111
cjok1051	3	7,928	$ 174,965
6theluckyone	3	7,988	$ 173,709
jhsukow	3	8,587	$ 173,529
pharrop	3	8,590	$ 173,459
sappy	3	8,432	$ 171,906
dh555	2	6,155	$ 171,008
bds9992	3	8,947	$ 165,997
copernicus	3	9,822	$ 158,718
NotoriousJ	3	9,208	$ 156,950

very interesting - would need to spend some time analyzing that $/Min Rem number. Not sure what to make of it. I do use $ per minute as guideline for some things and when you factor usage it can be pretty interesting. But blended over 9 or 10 players harder to say.

My experience is that often I end up +/- 1000 minutes from 16,000 drafted minutes. Once I start getting below around $140,000 remaining for cover the rest of my minutes / 82 (especially if I need a couple guys with usage), I start getting real nervous about my bench. Obviously you can tweak those if someone you ended up only needing goons to finish your minutes.

I really only care about having 9 guys who are good enough for playoff minutes.

This is just how I think though.

Posted by copernicus on 6/24/2019 11:36:00 AM (view original):
I usually just ball park 2m per 1000 minutes

Yeah I think we had a conversation about how you track team usage once too. You tend to have a more casual approach to this (and probably life in general) which I am kind of envious of.

I feel like every draft I forget to remind myself to "wait on drafting a PG!"

Posted by robusk on 6/24/2019 11:46:00 AM (view original):

Posted by copernicus on 6/24/2019 11:36:00 AM (view original):
I usually just ball park 2m per 1000 minutes

Yeah I think we had a conversation about how you track team usage once too. You tend to have a more casual approach to this (and probably life in general) which I am kind of envious of.

I used to spreadsheet a lot of this stuff but it just became too much for me - that said 2m per 1000 is about 164k per min so just about where I find myself now so maybe I'm more preciser than I'm allowing

Posted by robusk on 6/24/2019 11:48:00 AM (view original):
I feel like every draft I forget to remind myself to "wait on drafting a PG!"

there's like maybe 3-5 worth going after early and then it's yeah - even more so with SGs I think

So this is my best guess of where everyone is at after the first few picks in the fourth round. I will post it periodically a couple more times. This is with my best guess of what seasons are being used.

Row Labels	Count Plyers	Sum Min	Team PER%	Team MID%	Team PNT%	Team Usage	Team Oreb%	Team Dreb%	Team Creb%	Team Ast%	Tm eFG	Sum F/G	Tm TO%	Weighted Def	Sum Salary	$/Min Rem
24kpyrite	3	9,144	14%	28%	58%	12.2	29.3%	42.4%	71.7%	23.9%	54.6%	8.1	14.5%	51	25,934,596	$ 168,425
6theluckyone	3	7,988	26%	33%	41%	11.1	12.4%	32.7%	45.1%	40.0%	55.3%	6.8	11.9%	52	22,824,851	$ 173,709
bds9992	3	8,947	14%	41%	45%	10.3	17.9%	38.2%	56.1%	38.0%	56.4%	7.0	13.5%	57	25,839,487	$ 165,997
benhoidal	2	4,738	21%	37%	41%	6.1	6.9%	28.1%	35.1%	18.0%	58.3%	4.5	11.4%	55	14,638,118	$ 180,990
cjok1051	3	7,928	32%	35%	33%	6.7	8.7%	26.2%	34.9%	61.7%	55.8%	6.6	14.5%	47	22,521,976	$ 174,965
copernicus	3	9,673	5%	42%	53%	10.4	21.1%	54.7%	75.8%	30.4%	53.4%	8.8	11.7%	71	27,341,823	$ 165,721
dBKC	4	10,274	12%	32%	56%	13.7	19.8%	38.2%	58.0%	50.4%	58.1%	10.5	14.3%	52	27,826,768	$ 172,278
dh555	3	8,820	11%	39%	49%	7.8	18.5%	37.8%	56.2%	30.4%	57.9%	8.0	12.7%	64	26,045,962	$ 162,404
gerryred	3	8,186	25%	24%	51%	8.4	15.7%	44.9%	60.5%	21.1%	57.5%	7.9	13.1%	56	23,453,314	$ 172,180
isacqbs58	3	8,650	4%	43%	53%	8.8	16.2%	47.2%	63.4%	47.2%	53.2%	7.4	14.0%	65	24,606,982	$ 170,812
jackedjamie	4	11,958	20%	27%	52%	6.4	28.5%	52.8%	81.4%	54.9%	59.8%	8.6	15.1%	62	33,299,521	$ 150,959
jcred5	3	8,499	13%	43%	43%	10.3	16.0%	42.3%	58.3%	46.8%	54.3%	7.8	14.0%	56	25,148,608	$ 164,372
jhsukow	3	8,587	17%	38%	45%	10.4	18.4%	50.7%	69.0%	28.9%	56.1%	9.6	13.8%	50	24,117,485	$ 173,529
Midge	3	7,465	2%	38%	60%	10.3	20.0%	39.2%	59.2%	20.7%	54.6%	7.0	11.8%	58	21,960,208	$ 172,037
mikee1	3	8,997	14%	32%	54%	7.7	23.9%	47.3%	71.2%	28.4%	56.9%	8.6	12.5%	60	25,664,945	$ 168,170
mptrey	3	7,536	22%	36%	43%	8.3	9.1%	38.0%	47.1%	28.2%	56.4%	5.7	13.0%	51	22,017,901	$ 172,668
NotoriousJ	3	9,208	21%	30%	49%	10.3	19.2%	45.4%	64.6%	34.3%	58.2%	8.3	13.4%	55	27,492,257	$ 156,950
pharrop	3	8,590	11%	37%	51%	7.0	24.2%	54.3%	78.5%	18.1%	54.7%	8.2	10.7%	62	24,132,994	$ 173,459
redbooda	3	9,233	28%	38%	34%	12.6	12.3%	40.4%	52.7%	27.4%	52.4%	9.2	10.6%	64	24,595,280	$ 180,701
robusk	4	10,274	16%	31%	54%	8.7	18.4%	40.7%	59.1%	48.2%	56.6%	10.5	11.7%	58	27,666,688	$ 173,716
sappy	3	8,432	20%	34%	45%	9.1	13.9%	39.8%	53.6%	28.5%	57.5%	6.3	12.3%	65	24,006,571	$ 171,906
tarheel1991	3	7,690	19%	38%	43%	8.9	16.2%	41.8%	57.9%	32.2%	57.8%	6.9	13.2%	43	21,780,475	$ 176,601
tau1624	3	7,915	33%	24%	44%	4.6	14.4%	40.3%	54.8%	39.4%	59.0%	6.8	13.7%	55	21,021,370	$ 185,481
ysw128	3	8,795	5%	39%	55%	9.6	19.4%	49.4%	68.8%	23.5%	51.9%	7.4	11.1%	72	24,818,574	$ 171,511

so my team D is 2 90s and a 73 how does that work out to 71? I'm missing a factor I'm sure because you nailed the minutes but the rest isn't totals x 3