Dynasty rankings, DIII Topic

dang! I go farther than La Grange this season and they still pass me for #1!
10/17/2006 10:43 AM
Emerson went bye bye off the radar...lol
10/17/2006 11:02 AM
glad to see my 2nd championship at Delaware Valley moved me all the way up to 21st. I can only assume the 20 above me have 2 or more championships.
10/17/2006 10:12 PM
The Dynasty rankings are only based on the past 5 seasons. There is a bonus for qualifying for post-season in each of those seasons.
Even missing one season makes it almost impossible to crack the top 15. I value consistency most of all.
10/17/2006 10:25 PM
thanks al, i critique your system asking why my two championship Delaware Valley is only ranked 21st wondering if everyone above me has more than 2 championships and you redline me.
10/17/2006 11:12 PM
i guess your appreciation of consistency versus my appreciation of championships is clearly noticable when you click on our overall HD profiles. Kidding! Now we're even.
10/17/2006 11:14 PM
vandy vs. al feud!
10/18/2006 1:52 AM
Quote: Originally Posted By vandydave on 10/17/2006
thanks al, i critique your system .......and you redline me.
I know! I accidently hit 'report' instead of 'quote'.

Of course, any questioning of my skills is an obsenity and deserves to be punished!
10/18/2006 8:01 AM
After much consideration, I've altered the Dynasty formula. Previously, teams received 0 points if they failed to make post-season.
Under the new formula, you still must qualify for post-season play in 4 of the past 5 seasons. But, if you missed a season, you now earn points for having an RPI of 150 or better.
This doesn't affect the top 16 teams on the list. But here are the revised standings for the rest of the qualifying teams.
17. Heidelberg (previously #24)
18. Delaware Valley (#21)
19. Austin (#17)
20. Newbury (#19)
21. Endicott (#18)
22. Lewis Clark (#20)
23. Mary Hardin-Baylor (#21)
24. Gustavus Adolphus (#23)
25. So. Maine (#31)
26. Wilmington; 27. Centenary; 28. Bridgewater; 29. Pomona-Pilzer; 30. Knox; 31. Chestnut Hill; 32. Greenville; 33. Wabash; 34. Emerson; 35. Swarthmore; 36. Juniata; 37. E. Mennonite; 38. Misercordia; 39. Ithaca; 40. NC Wesleyan
11/5/2006 1:17 PM
Based on the Dynasty ratings, the East Region is by far the toughest this time with 5 Top 10 teams.
Top 25 Dynaties in each region:
MIDEAST: #14 Hanover
EAST: #4 Lakeland, #6 McMurry, #7 Skidmore, #8 Wheaton, #9 Transylvania, #24 Heidelberg
WEST: #3 SUNY Oneonta, #17 Austin
SOUTH: #2 Washington, #20 Lewis & Clark, #23 Gustavus Adolphus
11/29/2006 8:55 PM
according to "revised" rankings you are showing the old rankings
11/29/2006 9:10 PM
Dang! You're right!
Regardless, it looks as if Washington has a clear shot for the Final Four
11/30/2006 7:33 AM
are you trying to jinx me?
11/30/2006 10:31 AM
Quote: Originally Posted By alblack56 on 11/29/2006
Based on the Dynasty ratings, the East Region is by far the toughest this time with 5 Top 10 teams.
Top 25 Dynaties in each region:
MIDEAST: #14 Hanover
EAST: #4 Lakeland, #6 McMurry, #7 Skidmore, #8 Wheaton, #9 Transylvania, #24 Heidelberg
WEST: #3 SUNY Oneonta, #17 Austin
SOUTH: #2 Washington, #20 Lewis & Clark, #23 Gustavus Adolphus
kinda ironic that al didnt notice a seventh dynasty team in the East... Endicott!!!
12/3/2006 3:43 AM
can we assume that LaGrange's slight slippage the past three years (PI,NT2,PI) means that Oneonta and Washington will be 1,2?
And further... it certainly appears to me that tonights game will decide who is 1 and who is 2. right?
wow, if true, thats huge. oney has never been #1 in the newdyansty list.
It will be a tough hill to climb though. I put us at 8 point underdogs.
12/3/2006 3:53 AM
◂ Prev 1...5|6|7|8|9...30 Next ▸
Dynasty rankings, DIII Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2024 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.