Posted by r0b0t on 2/2/2011 10:14:00 AM (view original):
The cover article on the Philadelphia Daily News is about big butts and why they're so popular.

I just emailed it to my girlfriend, who has one of the finest bottoms I have ever seen.  Lovely bonus for a tiny Jewish girl.

thats not why you marry a jew.

Posted by vandydave on 2/2/2011 11:51:00 AM (view original):
thats not why you marry a jew.

take your xmas tree down

Posted by blackmink18 on 2/2/2011 11:55:00 AM (view original):

Posted by vandydave on 2/2/2011 11:51:00 AM (view original):
thats not why you marry a jew.

take your xmas tree down

i actually did last weekend

I helped someone get unstuck out of the snow. Lame.

Jesus would be proud.

if Jesus was works-based.

He prefers Office.

hi

ive got $1000 bucks in Best by reward zone points to cash out to get my new tv and the site is down until tomorrow morning. They are cockblocking my Super Bowl plans.

Do it. Vetoers are weak unhappy people.

Posted by jwelsh1023 on 2/2/2011 4:01:00 PM (view original):
I broke no rules in KP, should my trade be vetoed I shall wreak havoc.

I approved the trade so I can't see it anymore. Here are the only 2 rules that could apply.

3. SALARY CAP - $100 MIL. This somewhat minimizes the # of max salary contracts that can be offered. The reason I am for this is to guard against having to find an owner for a team with bad contracts if the original owner bails.
4. CASH IN TRADES - Cannot exceed the players' remaining salary. (If we institute the salary cap, the trade cannot put you over the cap.)

My salary is well below $100M

I got back 5m on a guy getting over 9m.

Posted by jwelsh1023 on 2/2/2011 6:45:00 PM (view original):
My salary is well below $100M

I got back 5m on a guy getting over 9m.

Yeah.... but your 'salary cap' will increase to $105 mil.

The trade does violate a poorly written and vague rule. More importantly, precedent was set last season when dahs deal went through and had to be renegotiated to bring the cap back to $100 mil.

*******