Is putting a still developing prospect with a 12-day injury on the 60-day DL a good idea? He'd improve in categories that he wasn't improving in before, but I am wondering if it is going to stunt his growth in the ratings he was developing in, or simply delay it. I'm fine with delaying it a cycle or 2, but obviously I'd rather not trade points in control, vL and vR for points in health and velocity.

That's always a balancing act with a 1st/2nd year player.   You have to decide which rating is more important.   I have no way to know if "lost" development due to being on the DL can be recaptured. 

Do you suppose if WIS keeps doing these "under the hood" upgrades that we might actually see one of the promised "meaningful game updates" in our lifetime?

I know you don't care but think we will ever see a hockey dynasty?

We might but I'm in my 50s.   Maybe not my lifetime.

I started screwing around with a soccer team while two of my HBD teams were in the playoffs(I was already eliminated).   Seems like they could turn that engine into a hockey engine with no problem.    Of course, the soccer dynasty is free and worlds are largely unpopulated(15 of 80 are human in my world) so I doubt there's much demand.

Not that it's not already too late, but may I have permission to use your name in the classified for one of my worlds?

I'm tied with a dead guy for #1 on the favorites list but 40 more users have blocked me than have made me a favorite.  I'm not sure using my name will help your cause.

To be fair, a lot of those were from the pit which is now also a dead guy?

(Smooth)

Did hockey1984 just ask a question?  Did I miss something?

Will the Raiders be playing home games in Los Angeles in 2016?

I think STL is more likely to move first.    But that might not stop the Raiders. 

He edited in the question mark, so does that downgrade his B+?

That was accounted for in the initial grade.   Grading is done on a curve.  Obviously.

Oh. I have a fun one. What's worse, putting a player on the trade block and getting a rediculously low ball offer or making a very fair offer on a player that would be mutually benificial to both teams and having the owner lose their $hit because they overvalue their players?