Not my formula, numbnuts.

A league that isn't an offense vs pitching league, numbnuts.

Most of my teams are over 100% , most of them are around 110%.   I find it hard to believe I "instinctively know" how to optimize my lineup so either:

There's a problem with the formula
or
A problem with the premise

I agree. There's no way you instinctively know how to optimize your lineup. There must be a problem with the formula...

numbnuts

I used to think booger was lemayripper using a different username but then after thinking about it, I recalled that  lemay was funny.

Posted by Trentonjoe on 3/9/2011 1:58:00 PM (view original):
Most of my teams are over 100% , most of them are around 110%.   I find it hard to believe I "instinctively know" how to optimize my lineup so either:

There's a problem with the formula
or
A problem with the premise

How does this logically follow?  It is completely possible to have an efficient line-up but have bad luck, underperformance or just not draft well.

Posted by AKlopp on 3/9/2011 2:44:00 PM (view original):
Does anyone else read boog's posts and hear the voice of Gregory House, MD is his or her head?

Not really. I read Boogerlips posts and hear Grocho Marx in my head

Posted by llamanunts on 3/9/2011 4:44:00 PM (view original):

Posted by Trentonjoe on 3/9/2011 2:55:00 PM (view original):
I used to think booger was lemayripper using a different username but then after thinking about it, I recalled that  lemay was funny.

Really is your go-to joke, eh?


1/27/2010 7:14 PM

Trentonjoe:

That can't be....you're kinda funny and boogerlips just thinks he's funny.

I'll make sure I space my jokes out more.   Once every forty days is to much for you huh?  When was the last time I referred  to you as a flying monkey?  May I use that soon?

Posted by zubinsum on 3/9/2011 4:12:00 PM (view original):

Posted by Trentonjoe on 3/9/2011 1:58:00 PM (view original):
Most of my teams are over 100% , most of them are around 110%.   I find it hard to believe I "instinctively know" how to optimize my lineup so either:

There's a problem with the formula
or
A problem with the premise

How does this logically follow?  It is completely possible to have an efficient line-up but have bad luck, underperformance or just not draft well.

Is the definition of "efficient" scoring more runs that you should?  Actual runs / RC/27?

If so, my point is that most of my teams do that.  If my teams are doing it "accident" there is a problem with your formula or premise.

It may just be that 100% is to low.  Maybe the sign of a truly efficient team is 110% or higher.

Hell no.  That was over a year ago.  I just have a phonographic pornographic I remember stuff.

Hell yes.  Call me a flying monkey daily.

Posted by Trentonjoe on 3/10/2011 9:08:00 AM (view original):

Posted by zubinsum on 3/9/2011 4:12:00 PM (view original):

Posted by Trentonjoe on 3/9/2011 1:58:00 PM (view original):
Most of my teams are over 100% , most of them are around 110%.   I find it hard to believe I "instinctively know" how to optimize my lineup so either:

There's a problem with the formula
or
A problem with the premise

How does this logically follow?  It is completely possible to have an efficient line-up but have bad luck, underperformance or just not draft well.

Is the definition of "efficient" scoring more runs that you should?  Actual runs / RC/27?

If so, my point is that most of my teams do that.  If my teams are doing it "accident" there is a problem with your formula or premise.

It may just be that 100% is to low.  Maybe the sign of a truly efficient team is 110% or higher.

I know it sounds weird, but have you considered that you're doing it on purpose?  Like, you're intentionally constructing a good lineup?