101 Openings-14 Relatively New Worlds. Topic

steelerstime
Posts: 38 (0)
Hall of Famer
72 14 7 34 52
Prospect
14 relatively new worlds (6 seasons or less) and now a glut of openings in established worlds.

-Is this a shock that after the problem from a couple years ago (excess openings), that the problem has reappeared?
-Or is it more of a shock that WIS didn't learn and allowed the creation of 14 new worlds in the past 2 years.
9/18/2011 9:23 PM
shobob
Posts: 3273 (0)
Hall of Famer
1 330
Prospect
They have the formula for merging worlds.  Maybe we'll need that.  I'd have no problem with it.
9/18/2011 9:32 PM
steelerstime
Posts: 38 (0)
Hall of Famer
72 14 7 34 52
Prospect
Problem with that-many of the worlds are in the 4-6 opening range.
9/18/2011 9:44 PM
willsauve
Posts: 2251 (0)
Hall of Famer
168 1 1 1 179
Prospect
problem is there's too many fucked up worlds that nobody wants to join..  I'm guessing you created this thread because you're likely in one that isnt filling?
9/18/2011 10:10 PM
willsauve
Posts: 2251 (0)
Hall of Famer
168 1 1 1 179
Prospect
Here's a solution.... Take all of the Super teams from Aaron, Spahn, Hunter and Glavine300, Foxx, Robert E McCabe,  Etc... and combine them into one world..  take all of the middle win pct teams and combine them...  then take all of the bottom feeder teams and combine them into another
9/18/2011 10:21 PM
steelerstime
Posts: 38 (0)
Hall of Famer
72 14 7 34 52
Prospect

I am in a world that just rolled.

But that isn't why I created the thread.

It was to point out the irrational behaviour of a company that had a problem, used resources to fix that problem-and two years later is facing the same dilemma.

But it sounds like your happy with it sauve.

9/18/2011 10:23 PM
steelerstime
Posts: 38 (0)
Hall of Famer
72 14 7 34 52
Prospect
That's a bad solution sauve. Carve up 10 or more different worlds?
 
Best solution is to not create so many new worlds.
9/18/2011 10:27 PM
willsauve
Posts: 2251 (0)
Hall of Famer
168 1 1 1 179
Prospect
Its always the same few worlds that dont fill...Combine them and the problem is solved.. The thing is all of you guys who have the teams that have won 100+ every season would finally have competition..
9/18/2011 10:27 PM
willsauve
Posts: 2251 (0)
Hall of Famer
168 1 1 1 179
Prospect
Posted by steelerstime on 9/18/2011 10:27:00 PM (view original):
That's a bad solution sauve. Carve up 10 or more different worlds?
 
Best solution is to not create so many new worlds.
Sure.. Bad idea...  Lets just force these **** teams down somebodies throat...  When you do this you're just looking for replacments every other season for the same donkey team..
9/18/2011 10:29 PM
steelerstime
Posts: 38 (0)
Hall of Famer
72 14 7 34 52
Prospect
There not all ******-many are not. But there are some that are truely screwed up.

But that isn't what your initial suggesting is trying to fix. It's to put losers (below .500 win %) with other losers in other worlds-then maybe they'll win something.
9/18/2011 10:38 PM
willsauve
Posts: 2251 (0)
Hall of Famer
168 1 1 1 179
Prospect

Im hesitant to pay $25 for a mediocre team in a world that has the same 6 teams that win 100 every season... Maybe Im just a *****...

9/18/2011 10:44 PM
shobob
Posts: 3273 (0)
Hall of Famer
1 330
Prospect
What, you don't like a challenge?  You must be a ***** to not want to have to put in $100 before having a shot at contending.
9/18/2011 10:53 PM
cdc80uf
Posts: 351 (0)
Hall of Famer
6 182
Prospect
Worlds will fill, period.
9/19/2011 12:25 AM
moosep
Posts: 1496 (0)
Hall of Famer
12 1 1 24 2 36
Veteran
I count 119.
9/19/2011 4:41 PM
csherwood
Posts: 533 (0)
Hall of Famer
12 116
Prospect
I kind of get a kick out of 14 openings in ABU.  So much for the original "save our world" world...once a tard, always a tard.
9/19/2011 4:58 PM
12345 Next ▸
101 Openings-14 Relatively New Worlds. Topic
△Top△Bottom

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2024 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.