Posted by MikeT23 on 4/15/2012 10:46:00 AM (view original):
griv, I think the rankings do a pretty good job of defining "good" worlds. And I define "good" as "competitive". No matter what ranking system is used, and there have been 5-6 different ones, the same worlds show up at the top. There's something to them.
RH, enjoyment doesn't really play a part. Some people inflict pain upon themselves for enjoyment. That doesn't mean it's a good thing to do.
or they are pertuating a stereotype -- I play in 8 worlds, based on this ranking system: numbers 1, 8,12, 14, 18(new), 23, 32, 35, and 136!!! world 136 and 14 have the same rules and until this season the same commish. I do not think league 136 is substantively different from leagues 23 on up. Yes the extremes may be different but the large mass of leagues in the middle I think are interchangable and on a whole competitive.