So let me see if I understand the argument logically. It is ok for the original, early acting team to sign a recruit relatively cheaply (by not getting "tight" with him) but not ok for a team that, for whatever reason, chooses to wait until later, but still within the prescribed time set aside by the game specifically for recruiting to do the same by (relatively cheaply) "poaching" that player? I suppose that the later acting teams should be forced to only recruit kids that no one else is considering (probably because they are not as good)? Recruiting (before signings) lasts 50 hours. As long as you spend your money first it is better than the coach who, for whatever reason, chooses to spend it late? Someone tell me if I'm getting close here?