Just because the state is full of 'tards that will vote for Romney doesn't mean the newspaper has to follow suit and support him.

Posted by stinenavy on 10/20/2012 11:15:00 PM (view original):
Just because the state is full of 'tards that will vote for Romney doesn't mean the newspaper has to follow suit and support him.

So you think it is a good idea for a newspaper to have a very different opinion than most of its readers?

It is very simple. The people who run newspapers are liberal and think like Obama so they will do anything to support him.

This is the media bias that the left claims doesnt exist.

Posted by swamphawk22 on 10/20/2012 8:03:00 PM (view original):
See you jumped over the meida bias one again. The 2nd one is just funny names and funny pictures. Most of the Obama theme since the start.

Again can anyone who wants to explain why an important state newspaper would endorse the candiadte that is going to lose by a landslide in their state?

Do we need anymore evidence of media bias?

So you are suggesting that businesses should have policies that reflect the beliefs of the residents of where they do business? What happened to your free marketplace of ideas, and let every voice (even the lying ones) be heard? Were you not vehemently defending Chick-Fil-A just a short time ago?

You are so messed up you can't even keep track of the crap you spout.

This isnt some business that sells you something that your political views shouldnt impact.

This is selling political opinions.

Why is the paper in area after area that is Pro-Romney endorsing Obama?

And this doesnt appear the least bit odd to you?

for a good laugh....


http://www.examiner.com/article/fluke-s-foray-fails-to-find-friends-for-obama

Posted by antoncresten on 10/21/2012 5:01:00 AM (view original):

She owns a horse too...

Start posting pics that explain how Obama is going to turn around his disasterous administration if America elects him.

Posted by swamphawk22 on 10/21/2012 12:16:00 AM (view original):
This isnt some business that sells you something that your political views shouldnt impact.

This is selling political opinions.

Why is the paper in area after area that is Pro-Romney endorsing Obama?

And this doesnt appear the least bit odd to you?

A business is a business, is it not? What difference does it make what it sells? Don't like it, don't buy it. More of your brilliance on display here.

Well there it is...

Why would a paper that sells opinions be against the majority of people in their area?

I dont want to make a law against it.

It just shows that there is a bias in journalism.

A paper that endorses Romney just because the majority of people in the area are pro-Romney would be foolish. The Opinion/Editorial page should endorse the candidate that, in its opinion, would be the better President. An unpopular opinion (in the immediate vicinity) is not evidence of bias.

Not once, but over and over?

Why would the newspapers be so much against Romney when America is split on the issue. Why wouldnt a paper in a Conservative area try to hire conservative oped staff members?

Posted by swamphawk22 on 10/22/2012 2:45:00 PM (view original):
Not once, but over and over?

Why would the newspapers be so much against Romney when America is split on the issue. Why wouldnt a paper in a Conservative area try to hire conservative oped staff members?

Occam's razor. It's not a vast liberal conspiracy, they just think Obama is a better candidate than Romney. Over and over.

That half the country thinks Romney would be better isn't very convincing. Half the country (46% to be exact) believes the world is 10,000 years old.