you've been defeated in the debate. when you feel it's necessary to write a novel with each post, you're probably saying so little of substance that you have to drag it out for 8 years as a ploy.
There is no ploy here, at least not from me. The fact of the matter is I've got a great deal of substance to my arguments, which is why some people are becoming flustered trying to argue against it. It's not "necessary to write a novel"; I'm merely addressing what people have to say.
even if you had held your own in this debate, nobody would give a damn. you're never going to convince rich people that they owe more than the 50% they're already wasting in taxes every year, just as i'm never going to convince you to get a vassectomy so that the world need not have any little bistizas guzzling anymore milk from the proverbial communal teet.
I've more than held my own in this debate - I've been dominant. You're simply denying this without a single shred of evidence because it's easier to do than to actually try to argue what you believe.
Also, rich people don't pay 50 percent in taxes - not even close (look at Romney as a chief example). That right there shows how little you know what you're talking about.
As for your other comments, attempts at insults are a solid "ploy" as you call it to distract from the fact that you have nothing of substance to say. So unless you want to make an actual argument, you're the last person who can say how anyone is doing in a debate.
Heh. I like this guy.
So this is MikeT23's other user name. What a shock that he would agree with this guy who brings the same sort of nothing to a debate then declares victory by hurling childish insults. Both attempts are equally pathetic.
People like you have two choices: Stop trying to claim victory through insults and actually provide something of substance (I seriously doubt you'll do this) or give up and wait for someone else to do it for you. Anything else is just a waste of time.