Posted by genghisxcon on 11/28/2012 8:18:00 PM (view original):
Funny that Mike wants to compare bad_luck to swamp, yet he goes stride for stride with swampy in defending the Palin-as-victim narrative. MikehawkT223?
Also, I enjoyed how, as if worried that he might be out-dumbassed in this thread, swamp went to the "there is no Bush Doctrine" trump card. Rest assured, swampy. No one can top that whopper.
There is no Bush Doctrine.
Some people over time have used the term, but they are using it as a classier version of "Agenda" or "policy".
Can someone say "Obama Doctrine" and have it mean one thing?
Truman Doctrine, or Monroe Doctrine means a specific thing.
Bush doctrine can mean multiple things. Preemptive strikes, torture for information, Democracy by force.
So she asked him what aspects, and he didnt just say what he wanted her to address. He went after her looking for the gotcha moment, knowing that she isnt "Media savy" and might slip up.
And anyone that disagrees is a Democratic stooge or THE DUMBASS OF ALL DUMBASSES.