Posted by achillesred on 1/31/2013 11:26:00 AM (view original):
I really like these reports alot. Most anticipated part of season for me outside of the second half of Title games. I always thought they were accurate until the last update. I now feel they are off a bit. One example would be my two OL recruits. I got into a big bidding war for one that is clearly my best. He is not even ranked although the other is. Winona Div II
I assume you are talking about Roberto Smith - his lower rating was based on low TECH and GI. As you can see, with his growth in those areas, his ratings are improving quite a bit.
Name |
Class |
Primary
Position |
Rating |
ATH |
SPD |
DUR |
WE |
STA |
STR |
BLK |
TKL |
HND |
GI |
ELU |
TECH |
Overall
Rank |
Position
Rank |
Class Rank
Overall |
Class Rank
Position |
Roberto Smith |
Fr. |
OL |
49.71 |
42 |
3 |
34 |
59 |
34 |
74 |
82 |
28 |
29 |
33 |
43 |
25 |
4331 |
OL738 |
490 |
OL73 |
Roberto Smith |
So. |
OL |
55.75 |
50 |
9 |
42 |
61 |
41 |
78 |
85 |
24 |
25 |
42 |
49 |
34 |
1732 |
OL239 |
194 |
OL22 |
I certainly don't think the formulas are perfect, but they are based on what the game designer at the time (JConte) told me were the important attributes for each position.