I'm not going to go read some creation propaganda site. If you have an argument, make it. If not, shut up.
You've got two MAJOR problems here, BL.
First, ignoring the information that proves you wrong doesn't make it disappear. The site I linked absolutely shows how your idea of radiocarbon dating is wrong; just because you supposedly refuse to read it doesn't change that fact.
Second, you not only buy into but also try to promote the propaganda of the homosexual agenda. That prevents you from having the credibility to call anything else propaganda.
The site I linked to makes my argument successfully. I've once again shown you to be the fool you are, and as usual, you are ignoring it and carrying on in your stubbornness.
I agree with BL here. Using a creationists website as proof that carbon dating might not be terribly accurate is like using Fox news to prove that the dem party is good for America. Fair and balanced indeed.
I'm merely providing the information that shows while carbon dating IS accurate, it is incorrect because of the assumptions being made.
I'm not "using" any website to do that. I'm merely providing a link to a site that gives the information; what you personally think of the site is completely irrelevant to the actual information.
After all, I could argue against any website you link to, but that doesn't mean anything either.