Posted by MikeT23 on 11/21/2013 2:55:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 11/21/2013 2:50:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 11/21/2013 2:49:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 11/21/2013 2:47:00 PM (view original):
What's better?
Full-time job, no healthcare
Part-time job, govt mandated healthcare
You're begging the question.
Someone with a full time job and no health care isn't "losing their coverage." Which is what we are talking about now.
I'm changing the subject. Which one of those two options is better for a non-skilled worker?
Ahem.
I'll answer. The guy with the full-time job has a better chance at providing basic necessities for his family than the part-time worker forced to purchase insurance.
The ACA is actually ******* the exact people it's supposed to help. However, less people will be unemployed because there is no sound business reason to give unskilled workers enough hours to force the offer of healthcare coverage. So the Prez's unemployment numbers look nicer and he can tout that he helped get healthcare coverage for all despite lowering the quality of life for many.
Fortunately, the demographic that voted for him isn't really smart enough to know that he's ******* them. It's just big business screwing labor again.