Posted by morganballer on 10/20/2013 2:51:00 AM (view original):
i should have been more clear:
he is low in only rebounding and sb (both of which he is 0 in)
he is high in speed, perimeter, and bh. judging by his growth in per vs bh, i'd say he's basically still high/high in perimeter.
average in the rest.
i'd project him at:
athleticism: 98 (..100 maybe?)
speed: 66 (conservative)
defense: 100 (he was 77 and high coming in)
perimeter: 70 (also pretty conservative)
bh: 80
passing: 70
all you guys atlking about overall ratings and how he's not even close need to have your heads examined
im assuming here you are considering this guy to be a sg? hes a great sg, that can't be denied - but there have been great sgs in this era with 90+ spd/per who still had strong ath/def. not that good, but the overall package was more appealing IMO. this guy is great though. i take back what i said about not even being willing to sign him in the olden days, i considered him as a 3, and also, not with the same lofty projections (guess i could have assumed it was like, all high high, but without that being listed, i didnt). nice signing for sure