After setting my lineups and so forth I now think my weak spots are at 100M and 110M.  Hopefully everybody ended up weak somewhere.  I think I will score a lot of runs at 80 and 90M, and everybody will be strong at 120M.  

Thank you! Your request has been successfully processed and you will receive confirmation via sitemail once the Gift Certificate has been sent.

Purchase Details

Please retain this information for your records.

Posted by ybjsports on 5/5/2014 3:54:00 PM (view original):

Posted by contrarian23 on 5/5/2014 2:48:00 PM (view original):
Jake Daubert

will be interested to see how he does, was on my short list

The short answer is...disappointing.  For a player whom I thought would normalize very well, especially for average, his contributions to my already meager offenses have been very limited:

80M
I used 1914 (RL: .329/.375/.432)
.303/.353/.390
OPS is 84 points lower than RL

90M
I used 1918 (RL: .308/.360/.429)
.287/.332/.368
OPS is 89 points lower than RL

100M
I used 1913 (RL: .350/.405/.423)
.305/.346/.349
OPS is 133 points lower than RL

110M
I used 1912 (RL: 308/.369/.415)
.245/.303/.295
OPS is 186 points lower than RL

120M
I used 1922 (RL: .336/.395/.492)
.269/.307/.336
OPS is 244 points below RL

All in all, Daubert was probably the worst in a series of poor selections I made.  The 100M season particularly disappointed me.  Given his RL .350 average in a year that should have normalized very well, and a +1 park for singles, I expected him to hit for a much better average.  Among the players who are significantly outhitting him are 1969 Clemente, 1950 Goodman, 1987 Mattingly, 1995 Piazza.