Random 5 (47 mil.) - (14 in) Revised Topic

72-73 Carolina Cougars elei?
7/22/2014 11:56 PM
Well that was slightly less painful than expected.  If there are no objections, I'm leaning towards grabbing a 2nd team as well
7/23/2014 12:11 AM
Posted by snydpie on 7/22/2014 11:56:00 PM (view original):
72-73 Carolina Cougars elei?
Yeah them. Can I redraw again?
7/23/2014 5:45 AM
Curious: are you randomizing team and year separately or as a unit?
7/23/2014 8:22 AM
I have a team complete, but I certainly don't love it.  I would go with a second team as well just to increase the chance that I get a better draw.
7/23/2014 8:23 AM
Posted by bmamba2942 on 7/22/2014 3:19:00 AM (view original):
Posted by snydpie on 7/21/2014 10:15:00 PM (view original):
Posted by alopez on 7/21/2014 9:03:00 PM (view original):
This sounds incredibly fun. Or incredibly awful. But either way. I'm in. 
Your team is:

PG. Washington Wizards (2011/12)
SG. Miami Heat (2008/09)
SF. Atlanta Hawks (1999/00)
PF. Charlotte Hornets (1988/89)
C. Toronto Raptors (2004/05)
That lucky bastard lol
Yeah, this is a pretty incredible draw.
7/23/2014 8:24 AM
I sitemailed you, but figured I'd post it here too. 

I'll take a redraw. 
7/23/2014 3:45 PM
Posted by brider212 on 7/23/2014 12:11:00 AM (view original):
Well that was slightly less painful than expected.  If there are no objections, I'm leaning towards grabbing a 2nd team as well
Do you want 2 teams or a re-draw? You can have 2 teams if you want.
7/23/2014 3:53 PM
Posted by robusk on 7/23/2014 8:22:00 AM (view original):
Curious: are you randomizing team and year separately or as a unit?
Teams and years separately.
7/23/2014 3:54 PM
Posted by robusk on 7/23/2014 8:23:00 AM (view original):
I have a team complete, but I certainly don't love it.  I would go with a second team as well just to increase the chance that I get a better draw.
Yes you can have 2 teams in this league if you want. I will make sure they are in separate conferences.
7/23/2014 3:56 PM
And the Randomizer continues to disappoint.........

Sooner or later it will happen!!!!!!!!!
7/23/2014 4:14 PM
Posted by robusk on 7/23/2014 8:23:00 AM (view original):
I have a team complete, but I certainly don't love it.  I would go with a second team as well just to increase the chance that I get a better draw.
Robusk, your 2nd team is:

PG. Brooklyn Nets 2013-14
SG. Houston Mavs 1967-68
SF. K.C. Omaha Kings 1972-73
PF. Baltimore Bullets 1960-61
C. OKC Thunder 2009-10
7/23/2014 4:43 PM
Posted by snydpie on 7/23/2014 3:54:00 PM (view original):
Posted by robusk on 7/23/2014 8:22:00 AM (view original):
Curious: are you randomizing team and year separately or as a unit?
Teams and years separately.
I thought that might be the case, which raises an interesting point (I am not trying to raise a big fuss here, just a discussion):

I would say the reason everyone is getting such crappy draws has a little less to do with randomness than we might think based on the way this is structured. Even though the more usable seasons (after the NBA/ABA merger) make up 63% of the available years (along with the denser years), the gross number of defunct tams make up like almost 60% of the the team base. Then, with most of the active teams, a number of them also have a history pre-merger.  So we are more heavily slanted towards early years even though a much larger number of the total player seasons are in the latter half.

Not saying we have to change it.  But it is something to think about.
7/23/2014 4:46 PM
Posted by snydpie on 7/23/2014 4:43:00 PM (view original):
Posted by robusk on 7/23/2014 8:23:00 AM (view original):
I have a team complete, but I certainly don't love it.  I would go with a second team as well just to increase the chance that I get a better draw.
Robusk, your 2nd team is:

PG. Brooklyn Nets 2013-14
SG. Houston Mavs 1967-68
SF. K.C. Omaha Kings 1972-73
PF. Baltimore Bullets 1960-61
C. OKC Thunder 2009-10
Baltimore Bullets weren't an active 60/61 team.
7/23/2014 4:52 PM
Posted by robusk on 7/23/2014 4:52:00 PM (view original):
Posted by snydpie on 7/23/2014 4:43:00 PM (view original):
Posted by robusk on 7/23/2014 8:23:00 AM (view original):
I have a team complete, but I certainly don't love it.  I would go with a second team as well just to increase the chance that I get a better draw.
Robusk, your 2nd team is:

PG. Brooklyn Nets 2013-14
SG. Houston Mavs 1967-68
SF. K.C. Omaha Kings 1972-73
PF. Baltimore Bullets 1960-61
C. OKC Thunder 2009-10
Baltimore Bullets weren't an active 60/61 team.
Just saw that lol. Sorry 1952 Baltimore Bullets
7/23/2014 4:52 PM
◂ Prev 1|2|3|4|5|6...12 Next ▸
Random 5 (47 mil.) - (14 in) Revised Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2024 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.