Posted by ab90 on 7/26/2015 5:28:00 PM (view original):
Posted by Benis on 7/26/2015 4:26:00 PM (view original):
You do realize that the rpi is hated by everyone as a way to determine who gets into the tourney in real bball right? This metric has massive flaws so why would you use that as the absolute reason for tourney bids?
question: you would object to seeding based on rpi on account of it being mathematical and computer-based, and thus not realistic enough to rank fake basketball teams that are mathematical and computer-based?
questions 2 and 3: are you my ex-wife, and did you get that alimony check last week? it hasn't been cashed yet and i just wanted to make sure.
hahaha, yeah appreciate that alimony. Bling bling.
I'm fine with using a mathematical and computer formula to rank fake basketball teams that are mathematical and computer based. Of course. All I'm saying is, the RPI isn't the best way to do it. There are other formulas and ranking systems out there that are recognized as much better that the RPI. I wouldn't just use straight RPI 1-64 make the NT because you can manipulate the RPI and artificially inflate it. Like Mr. Jamie Dixon does.
http://espn.go.com/blog/collegebasketballnation/post/_/id/64576/how-to-game-the-rpi