I'm pretty sure he does the latter.

Much in the same way that he gets to decide what somebody means when they post something he obviously doesn't understand. Or that invalidates his argument.

Posted by MikeT23 on 4/13/2017 9:28:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 4/13/2017 7:00:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 4/13/2017 6:57:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tecwrg on 4/13/2017 6:53:00 PM (view original):
The 'tard level of this thread rises with each subsequent dahs and BL post.

It's because they're stuck on completion %. It's not really that, it's the fact that he was inaccurate. He reminded me of early McNabb.

I don't think anyone is stuck on completion percentage.

Again, if you think Tebow was good, say so. Otherwise STFU.

Again, I said he was good enough to be a back-up.

Do you even read other people's posts or just reply with what you think they might have posted?

Yeah. You think he's good enough to be a second string QB in the NFL. Yet, the last time he was on a roster was 5 years ago and then he was a third string QB behind Mark Sanchez and some anonymous never-played-again 7th rounder. Not a great case.

Because most teams didn't want the attention his presence would attract from fans and the media. No one wants fans chanting for the backup 90% of the time the starter is on the field.

Posted by Jtpsops on 4/13/2017 11:16:00 PM (view original):
Because most teams didn't want the attention his presence would attract from fans and the media. No one wants fans chanting for the backup 90% of the time the starter is on the field.

No one was chanting for him in NY and ******* Mark Buttfumble Sanchez was the starter.

Uh, yeah, they were.

It's not nice to throw actual facts that goes against his agenda at BL.

I know, my bad. Can't wait for him to ask me to supply 37 sources backing up my claim.

Posted by MikeT23 on 4/14/2017 6:59:00 AM (view original):
Uh, yeah, they were.

You're right. Holy ****. Jets fans are ******* idiots.

Posted by bad_luck on 4/14/2017 9:40:00 AM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 4/14/2017 6:59:00 AM (view original):
Uh, yeah, they were.

You're right. Holy ****. Jets fans are ******* idiots.

I think this is something we all can finally agree on.

When the options are Sanchez and McElroy, it doesn't make them idiots. They know what was on the field, they'd rather have what wasn't. Which is why I said Tebow had to play for a team with a defined #1.

Posted by bad_luck on 4/14/2017 9:40:00 AM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 4/14/2017 6:59:00 AM (view original):
Uh, yeah, they were.

You're right. Holy ****. Jets fans are ******* idiots.

Which is the main reason teams didn't want Tebow. Unless there was a stud #1, fans would chant for him. Orton was a better QB than Tebow in Denver and every game until Tebow took over, there were endless "Tebow!" chants.

Posted by MikeT23 on 4/14/2017 11:29:00 AM (view original):
When the options are Sanchez and McElroy, it doesn't make them idiots. They know what was on the field, they'd rather have what wasn't. Which is why I said Tebow had to play for a team with a defined #1.

And my point is that Tebow wasn't good enough to beat out McElroy to be Mark Sanchez's backup. What makes you think he's good enough to be a serviceable backup now?

Posted by toddcommish on 4/14/2017 10:50:00 AM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 4/14/2017 9:40:00 AM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 4/14/2017 6:59:00 AM (view original):
Uh, yeah, they were.

You're right. Holy ****. Jets fans are ******* idiots.

I think this is something we all can finally agree on.

well, cresten is a Jet fan, so I think the point is proven

Posted by bad_luck on 4/14/2017 12:40:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 4/14/2017 11:29:00 AM (view original):
When the options are Sanchez and McElroy, it doesn't make them idiots. They know what was on the field, they'd rather have what wasn't. Which is why I said Tebow had to play for a team with a defined #1.

And my point is that Tebow wasn't good enough to beat out McElroy to be Mark Sanchez's backup. What makes you think he's good enough to be a serviceable backup now?

So you're saying Rex Ryan is a QB expert?

Posted by bad_luck on 4/14/2017 12:40:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 4/14/2017 11:29:00 AM (view original):
When the options are Sanchez and McElroy, it doesn't make them idiots. They know what was on the field, they'd rather have what wasn't. Which is why I said Tebow had to play for a team with a defined #1.

And my point is that Tebow wasn't good enough to beat out McElroy to be Mark Sanchez's backup. What makes you think he's good enough to be a serviceable backup now?

The more salient point is that Tebow was comparable (and actually had a better track record than McElroy), yet was too much of a distraction as a backup for a dysfunctional franchise with a ****** starter to stomach. A solid franchise with an undisputed starter could've (and probably should've) had him as a backup.