Can it get any worse? Topic

Twitter rants?
10/17/2016 10:17 AM
HILLARY UP 11 PTS. IN LATEST WALL STREET JOURNAL POLL(THAT LIBERAL MEDIA RAG OWNED BY RUPERT MURDOCH)
10/17/2016 10:35 AM
Posted by MikeT23 on 10/17/2016 10:17:00 AM (view original):
Twitter rants?
10/17/2016 10:38 AM
Posted by tecwrg on 10/17/2016 9:58:00 AM (view original):
And other than you're obvious hatred for Clinton, what in your opinion makes Trump a good candidate for President?
I'm following ABC (Anybody But Clinton) politics. Hell, I even voted for Socialist Sanders in the primary (closed State). I'm not the one continuing to act like "my" candidate is actually good. What part of "two worst candidates ever" (which I have said many time in several threads) is confusing?
10/17/2016 11:05 AM
Why do you feel a need to vote for either of the "two worst candidates ever"?

You can vote for Johnson.
You can vote for Stein.
You can cast a write-in vote for somebody else.
You can choose to NOT vote for president at all (but vote for all other offices on your ballot).

Voting for a candidate, any candidate, that you feel is among the "worst candidates ever" seems unconscionable.
10/17/2016 11:12 AM
Posted by all3 on 10/17/2016 11:05:00 AM (view original):
Posted by tecwrg on 10/17/2016 9:58:00 AM (view original):
And other than you're obvious hatred for Clinton, what in your opinion makes Trump a good candidate for President?
I'm following ABC (Anybody But Clinton) politics. Hell, I even voted for Socialist Sanders in the primary (closed State). I'm not the one continuing to act like "my" candidate is actually good. What part of "two worst candidates ever" (which I have said many time in several threads) is confusing?
Clinton certainly isn't perfect, but she's a far better option than Trump.
10/17/2016 11:20 AM
Posted by bad_luck on 10/17/2016 11:20:00 AM (view original):
Posted by all3 on 10/17/2016 11:05:00 AM (view original):
Posted by tecwrg on 10/17/2016 9:58:00 AM (view original):
And other than you're obvious hatred for Clinton, what in your opinion makes Trump a good candidate for President?
I'm following ABC (Anybody But Clinton) politics. Hell, I even voted for Socialist Sanders in the primary (closed State). I'm not the one continuing to act like "my" candidate is actually good. What part of "two worst candidates ever" (which I have said many time in several threads) is confusing?
Clinton certainly isn't perfect, but she's a far better option than Trump.
Not really. And, obviously, since you won't take a bet that she beats Trump by 192+, the country doesn't see her as "far better". But, as someone who admitted he never voted Republican beyond local elections, I can understand why you think that.
10/17/2016 12:03 PM
HILLARY---- 406 DRUMPF------132
10/17/2016 12:14 PM
Posted by MikeT23 on 10/17/2016 12:03:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 10/17/2016 11:20:00 AM (view original):
Posted by all3 on 10/17/2016 11:05:00 AM (view original):
Posted by tecwrg on 10/17/2016 9:58:00 AM (view original):
And other than you're obvious hatred for Clinton, what in your opinion makes Trump a good candidate for President?
I'm following ABC (Anybody But Clinton) politics. Hell, I even voted for Socialist Sanders in the primary (closed State). I'm not the one continuing to act like "my" candidate is actually good. What part of "two worst candidates ever" (which I have said many time in several threads) is confusing?
Clinton certainly isn't perfect, but she's a far better option than Trump.
Not really. And, obviously, since you won't take a bet that she beats Trump by 192+, the country doesn't see her as "far better". But, as someone who admitted he never voted Republican beyond local elections, I can understand why you think that.
There's definitely a chance she wins by 192, but I think 144 is much more likely.

As someone who constantly rails on the stupidity of the masses, you shouldn't be surprised that a significant portion of the electorate sees Trump as a good choice.
10/17/2016 1:04 PM
Posted by all3 on 10/16/2016 6:54:00 PM (view original):
Trump has proven he doesn't worry about telling people what they want to hear. He's also proven he says what is on his mind. I respect and value that infinitely more than Clinton's lies. Also, FWIW, I've had the same saint of a wife since fairly young and plan on keeping it that way.

Again, I can respect a difference of opinion as to which one is worse, as long as it's based on your feelings about these specific candidates, and not the "Party Line" bull sh!t b_l follows. I'm curious as to which it is for you two.
so you respect that he says what is on his mind, even if what is on his mind is racist, sexist, self serving crap?
10/17/2016 1:08 PM
Posted by wylie715 on 10/17/2016 1:08:00 PM (view original):
Posted by all3 on 10/16/2016 6:54:00 PM (view original):
Trump has proven he doesn't worry about telling people what they want to hear. He's also proven he says what is on his mind. I respect and value that infinitely more than Clinton's lies. Also, FWIW, I've had the same saint of a wife since fairly young and plan on keeping it that way.

Again, I can respect a difference of opinion as to which one is worse, as long as it's based on your feelings about these specific candidates, and not the "Party Line" bull sh!t b_l follows. I'm curious as to which it is for you two.
so you respect that he says what is on his mind, even if what is on his mind is racist, sexist, self serving crap?
In a word, YES! I'd rather know the faults of my "leader" and be able to prepare as I see fit for what I think their actions may be than have no freakin' clue what they are going to do, but know it certainly isn't what they're telling me.

The fact that even b_l keeps dodging the question and can't come up with one single thing that makes Clinton better (other than she's not Trump) says more than I ever could about her. Think about it - the biggest Clinton supporter on this site can't post one single thing she has done that makes her a better candidate than Trump. He's pretty much admitting she's garbage too, just garbage he'd prefer.

I will never (health willing) not vote. I take that as my duty as an American. There are billions of people in the World who would love such an opportunity, yet millions of Americans take it for granted or ignore it. As bad as the choices are, Trump or Clinton is going to be our next President, and since I shudder at the thought of what Clinton will do to this Country, why would I vote for anyone other than the person who has the best chance to defeat her? You think 50+ % of those people being polled want actually want Clinton as their President, or are the voting against the best chance to defeat Trump?
10/17/2016 1:48 PM (edited)
All3, I didn't realize you'd asked me a question.

Clinton is better primarily because she has relevant experience. There is no doubt that she has the ability and temperament to run the country. There is significant doubt that Trump does.

10/17/2016 2:12 PM
Gotta agree with BL here. Hill has 30 years worth of lying, cheating and stealing experience. There is no doubt she has the ability and temperament to run the country into the ground. There is significant doubt that Trump does.
10/17/2016 2:18 PM
Posted by all3 on 10/17/2016 1:48:00 PM (view original):
Posted by wylie715 on 10/17/2016 1:08:00 PM (view original):
Posted by all3 on 10/16/2016 6:54:00 PM (view original):
Trump has proven he doesn't worry about telling people what they want to hear. He's also proven he says what is on his mind. I respect and value that infinitely more than Clinton's lies. Also, FWIW, I've had the same saint of a wife since fairly young and plan on keeping it that way.

Again, I can respect a difference of opinion as to which one is worse, as long as it's based on your feelings about these specific candidates, and not the "Party Line" bull sh!t b_l follows. I'm curious as to which it is for you two.
so you respect that he says what is on his mind, even if what is on his mind is racist, sexist, self serving crap?
In a word, YES! I'd rather know the faults of my "leader" and be able to prepare as I see fit for what I think their actions may be than have no freakin' clue what they are going to do, but know it certainly isn't what they're telling me.

The fact that even b_l keeps dodging the question and can't come up with one single thing that makes Clinton better (other than she's not Trump) says more than I ever could about her. Think about it - the biggest Clinton supporter on this site can't post one single thing she has done that makes her a better candidate than Trump. He's pretty much admitting she's garbage too, just garbage he'd prefer.

I will never (health willing) not vote. I take that as my duty as an American. There are billions of people in the World who would love such an opportunity, yet millions of Americans take it for granted or ignore it. As bad as the choices are, Trump or Clinton is going to be our next President, and since I shudder at the thought of what Clinton will do to this Country, why would I vote for anyone other than the person who has the best chance to defeat her? You think 50+ % of those people being polled want actually want Clinton as their President, or are the voting against the best chance to defeat Trump?
The depth of stupidity of this post is monumental.

"I'd rather know the faults of my "leader" and be able to prepare as I see fit for what I think their actions may be than have no freakin' clue what they are going to do, but know it certainly isn't what they're telling me."

So for instance, you'd be comfortable if one candidate said that he would probably nuke the Middle East to get rid of all those damn pesky terrorist towel heads, because he's coming right out and saying it as opposed to somebody else who might prefer a more measured approach? If so, then GOOD JOB, SPARKY!

Also, making a conscious decision to not vote is every bit a part of your rights and duty as an American. Your right to vote is the FREEDOM to use your vote as you see fit. Deliberately choosing to not vote for either of the "two worst candidates in history", or whatever you called them, is far different from not voting because (a) you're not allowed to vote, or (b) you just don't give a ****, i.e. apathy.

And finally, your decision to vote for Trump is purely a vote against Clinton, and not a vote because you think Trump is a qualified and worthy candidate. You've said so yourself. Which makes you part of the problem in this country, because that's a completely irresponsible way to exercise your vote.

You say that you "shudder at the thought of what Clinton will do to this country", yet have you even spent a nano-second of rational thought about what Trump would do to this country? Probably not, because it seems unlikely that you're even capable of rational thought.
10/17/2016 2:21 PM
◂ Prev 1|2|3|4|5...12 Next ▸
Can it get any worse? Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2024 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.