Trumps meltdown is epic. Beyond Brittney and Lindsay.

If you are still on the Trump train you're an idiot.

Or you're DougOut. Or both.

The only thing that could make it worse would be if he whips it out on national TV during the next debate.

And really, would that be that much of a surprise?

And he wouldn't lose any of his base.

He could grab Hillary by her *****.

That would be gross.

Since Trump is such a bad candidate, why isn't Clinton ahead by 50 points?

Posted by all3 on 10/15/2016 10:11:00 AM (view original):
Since Trump is such a bad candidate, why isn't Clinton ahead by 50 points?

There are a lot more angry rednecks in this country then we thought.

Posted by all3 on 10/15/2016 10:11:00 AM (view original):
Since Trump is such a bad candidate, why isn't Clinton ahead by 50 points?

Because roughly 40% of the population eats paint chips.

It is interesting that the Trump line has gone from "Trump's gonna crush her," to, "if Trump's so bad, why isn't Clinton beating him by even more?!?"

Posted by DougOut on 10/15/2016 7:05:00 AM (view original):

Posted by sjpoker on 10/14/2016 7:51:00 PM (view original):
Or you're DougOut. Or both.

A WIN - WIN SITUATION!

LOL

Posted by all3 on 10/15/2016 10:11:00 AM (view original):
Since Trump is such a bad candidate, why isn't Clinton ahead by 50 points?

Because Clinton is barely better - which tells you just how bad Trump AND Hillary are.

Posted by sjpoker on 10/15/2016 12:54:00 PM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 10/15/2016 10:11:00 AM (view original):
Since Trump is such a bad candidate, why isn't Clinton ahead by 50 points?

Because Clinton is barely better - which tells you just how bad Trump AND Hillary are.

Exactly. Anyone acting like Clinton is even close to a good candidate is either as dellusional as she is, or just plain incredibly stupid.

So since she is a " delusional elitist" then it is ok for the party of elitism to nominate the ultimate *******? OK, I get it now

Posted by RCBracco on 10/15/2016 4:56:00 PM (view original):
So since she is a " delusional elitist" then it is ok for the party of elitism to nominate the ultimate *******? OK, I get it now

This just further illustrates the point. Someone posts something negative about Clinton and all her supporters can do is come back with the juvenile "But Trump is worse.". That may or may not be true, but that response (along with all the others of it's kind) show there is nothing good about Clinton to reply with.

I am not a Clinton supporter but that does not mean that I would vote for that piece of crap that the GOP calls a candidate. Of two bad choices I would prefer her just on experiance