Posted by CoachSpud on 10/26/2016 12:28:00 PM (view original):
" One other thing WIS could do which still isn't ideal is to give the EE school a one-time infusion of large quantity of AP (i.e. same amount you would of gotten over the entire first period) ex. X AP per EE which would could assign at the start of the 2nd session. That would at least let the coach open up things after the first cycle assuming they didn't sign immediately. "
I believe recruiting process should lead to success based on the merits of the recruiting efforts of the various coaches -- all of the coaches. Your suggestion gives a windfall to one coach without regard to the merits of his recruiting efforts, and crushes any coach who made meritorious efforts on any recruit that the EE coach uses his windfall on. Thus, meritorious efforts are defeated by your arbitrary windfall.
I disagree. It is giving them credit for their great recruiting in a previous year, when they signed a guy who became an EE.
AND .. you are NOT giving them anything they didn't earn. What hippo is staying is .. you had an EE declare, you found that out at the beginning of Session 2. Well, there were X (maybe 20) turns in session 1 where you did not get any APs for this guy, so we will give you those 20x20=400 APs and you can use them however you want since you did not get them in session 1.
That makes sense to me .. the EE guy IS LEAVING .. if he had been a senior, you would have gotten 400 APs .. if he is an EE, you should get those 400 APs too.