Just saw the first trade veto I've ever seen and it was my own. They said they thought I was giving up too much. I vehemently disagree. Is this something I man up and move on from or is this something to be upset about?

Details?

I gave up:

https://www.whatifsports.com/HBD/Pages/Popups/PlayerRatings.aspx?pid=7194853 Herbert Huckaby and
https://www.whatifsports.com/HBD/Pages/Popups/PlayerRatings.aspx?pid=6540966 Jamie Dickinson

for

https://www.whatifsports.com/HBD/Pages/Popups/PlayerRatings.aspx?pid=6540979 Wally Anderson

Huckaby is great but I don't value Stamina and Durability as much as I do VS Right. He has 65 vs right which I don't love. I also have a lot of depth for relievers. I have a 91 rated closer and another reliever that will be 80 by the end of the year

It looks the other way around for me - was the other owner brand new?

No 53 previous seasons. But apparently he was ripping me off. I proposed the trade though. I didn't feel ripped off

You stole from him. Not sure what anyone else is looking at.

Assuming you want to win and other people only make trades they think will make their team better you should veto every move of consequence up to the time all of your trades start getting vetoed. It's the only move that makes sense.

The only reason to veto is collusion. I'd be pretty ****** about that trade veto as well.

Meh. In HBD, you can't let lopsided trades go thru. There are dozens of merged/unfilled worlds that back me up. That said, it wasn't egregious enough to veto. But it was a robbery.

If a guy with 53 seasons under his belt is getting ripped off, I let it happen. You've played the game long enough.

Anything over 30 I usually don't even bother looking at the players being traded.

But yeah, I'd be ****** if I were you. They vetoed you getting a Cy Young quality star in his prime, for an overpaid SP4 and a SuB. Heck of a trade to get the other owner to agree to.

Shouldn't have been vetoed...but it was pretty lop-sided in your favor.