Posted by schwarze on 1/26/2017 6:36:00 PM (view original):
Decade |
Win |
Loss |
Win% |
Best |
Owner |
-------------- |
---------- |
---------- |
------------- |
---------- |
---------- |
1900 |
186 |
138 |
0.574 |
22 |
redwingscup |
1910 |
185 |
139 |
0.571 |
20 |
multiple |
1940 |
173 |
151 |
0.534 |
19 |
pedrocerrano |
1970 |
168 |
156 |
0.519 |
20 |
bardin |
2010 |
161 |
163 |
0.497 |
18 |
Jtpsops |
1980 |
155 |
169 |
0.478 |
16 |
skunk206 |
1960 |
155 |
169 |
0.478 |
18 |
schwarze |
1920 |
155 |
169 |
0.478 |
18 |
zlionsfan |
1950 |
155 |
169 |
0.478 |
16 |
schwarze |
1930 |
154 |
170 |
0.475 |
17 |
ozomatli |
1990 |
153 |
171 |
0.472 |
19 |
skunk206 |
2000 |
144 |
180 |
0.444 |
17 |
slainte |
-------------- |
---------- |
---------- |
---------- |
|
|
N.L. |
1008 |
936 |
0.519 |
|
|
A.L. |
936 |
1008 |
0.481 |
|
|
Of course that 18-win team of mine isn't even winning its division. Still, a successful '20s team was not how I saw this working out, and if I had to pick a dog, I would have probably chosen '20s or 2010s instead of 2000s.
Playoffs start tomorrow, right?