Thru 15 games
.

Group	Win	Loss	Win%
--------------	----------	----------	----------
I	103	77	0.572
B	99	81	0.550
G	98	82	0.544
E	95	85	0.528
J	93	87	0.517
F	90	90	0.500
D	90	90	0.500
L	87	93	0.483
H	83	97	0.461
K	82	98	0.456
C	80	100	0.444
A	80	100	0.444

Decade	Win	Loss	Win%
--------------	----------	----------	----------
1900	106	74	0.589
1950	97	83	0.539
1940	96	84	0.533
1910	91	89	0.506
1980	91	89	0.506
1970	90	90	0.500
1920	89	91	0.494
1930	87	93	0.483
1990	86	94	0.478
2010	85	95	0.472
2000	82	98	0.456
1960	80	100	0.444
--------------	----------	----------	----------
N.L.	566	514	0.524
A.L.	514	566	0.476

Grp	Name	1900	1910	1920	1930	1940	1950	1960	1970	1980	1990	2000	2010	Wins	Total
-----	------------------	-------	-------	-------	-------	-------	-------	-------	-------	-------	-------	-------	-------	-------	-------
A	mpitt76	9		8		10		3		6		6		42	80
A	calhoop		8		6		9		5		4		6	38
B	schwarze		11				9	9	6		5		7	47	99
B	ozomatli	10		9	8	8				10		7		52
C	ejstockman		8		7		7		7		5		6	40	80
C	d_rock97	9		8		7		5		7		4		40
D	Jtpsops		9		5		7		4		5		12	42	90
D	dougpalm	6		8		10		6		10		8		48
E	GuerillaZen1	8	4		8	7	8	10						45	95
E	zlionsfan			12					8	6	10	5	9	50
F	slainte							7	8	9	9	9	7	49	90
F	PennQuaker	9	6	4	8	7	7							41
G	njbigwig		11		7		6		8		6		8	46	98
G	pedrocerrano	11		7		10		8		11		5		52
H	duece_duece	10		4		8		8		6		4		40	83
H	brianjw		4		9		9		7		8		6	43
I	skunk206		8	8	10				8	9	11			54	103
I	redwingscup	13				6	10	7				9	4	49
J	bardin		7		6		6	5	11			7		42	93
J	mildnhazy	11		9		5				6	10		10	51
K	buddhagamer	7		7		9		6		6		9		44	82
K	justinlee_24		9		5		7		7		6		4	38
L	batandball	3			8		12	6	11				6	46	87
L	Relkcirts		6	5		9				5	7	9		41
-----	------------------	-------	-------	-------	-------	-------	-------	-------	-------	-------	-------	-------	-------
	Total Wins	106	91	89	87	96	97	80	90	91	86	82	85
	Rank	1	4	7	8	3	2	12	6	4	9	11	10

My teams haven't had a very good start. Usually, that's bad enough but now in this tourney, I feel like I'm letting down my partner! That's a really bad feeling...

Atleast me and Stockman are equal. Sucks my 2000s team is dragging the rest of mine down

Most surprising result, to me, so far is the 1990s not doing well.

Posted by bardin on 1/22/2017 10:11:00 PM (view original):
My teams haven't had a very good start. Usually, that's bad enough but now in this tourney, I feel like I'm letting down my partner! That's a really bad feeling...

Waaaayyy too early for that!

I'm surprised at two things (1) how well the '50s are doing and (2) the level of fatigue I'm seeing on my teams. Quite a few extra inning games so far, including back to back 16 inning affairs.

The fatigue is like nothing I have ever experienced in this game. I am having to micromanage every cycle.

E

GuerillaZen1

1398

1397

-

1408

1381

1423

1361

-

-

-

-

-

1395

1487

94%

No. I get that. But A) I drafted roughly the same number of innings I have always drafted for 120.00 mil leagues without issue. B) I am also experiencing random position player fatigue.

After getting burned in the WIS Championship Round 2 $65M league, due to fatigue, I am convinced that quality of competition is a key variable in the amount of innings needed. I thought I drafted enough innings but should have factored in that my competition was the best of the best and maybe went 10% higher.

These leagues are tilted towards hitting. More quality hitting in most decades than pitching.

Posted by ozomatli on 1/23/2017 10:53:00 AM (view original):
These leagues are tilted towards hitting. More quality hitting in most decades than pitching

The 90s is baffling though. My Pedro and Maddux are getting shelled early on.

Posted by schwarze on 1/23/2017 9:09:00 AM (view original):
After getting burned in the WIS Championship Round 2 $65M league, due to fatigue, I am convinced that quality of competition is a key variable in the amount of innings needed. I thought I drafted enough innings but should have factored in that my competition was the best of the best and maybe went 10% higher.

Agree. Not sure about the 10% higher drafting totals number, as I'm willing to play my position players down in fatigue a bit and wouldn't want to sacrifice too much quality. Your point about not playing any weak sisters is very well taken however, and one I didn't factor into my PA and IP totals. Will struggle on.