Posted by all3 on 5/27/2017 10:53:00 AM (view original):
Take it easy on b_l. He's still trying to figure-out how all his precious polls were so incredibly wrong.
Wait till he actually moves-on from what happened almost 7 months ago (should only take another 2 or 3 years) and sees what happened in Montana - his head will explode. Add-in the incredible beat-down the Dems are more and more likely to receive in November (check the latest contribution figures), and he may need round-the-clock care.

Your tard is showing. How can there be this incredible beat-down when there's barely any elections worth noting in November 2017. 2 governorships.....and I think 1 house seat, Chaffetz's.

Posted by tecwrg on 5/27/2017 10:28:00 AM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 5/27/2017 9:11:00 AM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 5/26/2017 8:20:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 5/26/2017 7:48:00 PM (view original):
However you want to spin it, it still comes back to the money. Negative Trump sells.

Agree. That's cause liberals like to spend money. Not because they are the majority.

I think Dems are the majority. More people are registered Dems, Clinton got more votes than Trump, and even in Congress, as a whole, Dems get more votes.

You keep pointing out that Clinton got more votes than Trump, as if it's relevant.

Maybe you should take a civics class, understand how the presidential electoral process works in this country.

It's certainly relevant to the question of which party is in the majority. ********.

Posted by The Taint on 5/27/2017 12:22:00 PM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 5/27/2017 10:53:00 AM (view original):
Take it easy on b_l. He's still trying to figure-out how all his precious polls were so incredibly wrong.
Wait till he actually moves-on from what happened almost 7 months ago (should only take another 2 or 3 years) and sees what happened in Montana - his head will explode. Add-in the incredible beat-down the Dems are more and more likely to receive in November (check the latest contribution figures), and he may need round-the-clock care.

Your tard is showing. How can there be this incredible beat-down when there's barely any elections worth noting in November 2017. 2 governorships.....and I think 1 house seat, Chaffetz's.

Been down this road before several times. Look back and catch-up if you need too. Not all "worthy" elections are for seats in DC.

Posted by bad_luck on 5/27/2017 2:05:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tecwrg on 5/27/2017 10:28:00 AM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 5/27/2017 9:11:00 AM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 5/26/2017 8:20:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 5/26/2017 7:48:00 PM (view original):
However you want to spin it, it still comes back to the money. Negative Trump sells.

Agree. That's cause liberals like to spend money. Not because they are the majority.

I think Dems are the majority. More people are registered Dems, Clinton got more votes than Trump, and even in Congress, as a whole, Dems get more votes.

You keep pointing out that Clinton got more votes than Trump, as if it's relevant.

Maybe you should take a civics class, understand how the presidential electoral process works in this country.

It's certainly relevant to the question of which party is in the majority. ********.

Oh, maybe I'm missing something.

Which party holds the White House? And the Senate? And the House of Representatives?

Yes, you are missing something. The president isn't elected by the popular vote, so the fact that there are more dems doesn't automatically mean the president will be a democrat.

Hillary won the big, liberal states by a wide margin. Got her head handed to her everywhere else. Losing the Electoral by 72 isn't close. Yet even today the wino said she won. Delusional...

Have some more Chardonnay, Honey...

Posted by DoctorKz on 5/27/2017 11:31:00 PM (view original):
Hillary won the big, liberal states by a wide margin. Got her head handed to her everywhere else. Losing the Electoral by 72 isn't close. Yet even today the wino said she won. Delusional...

No one is claiming she won. I'm saying she got more votes.

She just did. Again. And once again put blame on everyone except herself. Added voter suppression to her list of excuses.

http://dailycaller.com/2017/05/26/hillary-clinton-has-a-new-excuse-for-why-she-lost/

And that nyrag article is pathetic. Crybabies saying it was a competent woman losing to an incompetent man, that she is a victim. Nothing about her being a person under investigation, or that she ran a lousy campaign. What a lack of taking personal responsibility. Easier to blame something else...

I have no doubt that a woman will be President in the near future. But she faceplanted a sure victory. People didn't want her, didn't like her, didn't trust her...

Ah, they tried to get electors to change their votes. Begged for recounts, wanted the Electoral College thrown out.

She knew the process. Was beaten fair and square, cries foul nonetheless. ..

Yeah she got more votes. 4 million in California. Won the big city states. Ignored the rest. Brilliant.

Trump would have worked harder in those states if the popular vote decided the election. Those weren't the rules though. And they both knew it.