If all the big boys felt the same as npb#, it would be fine. Just judging from these boards, and the defections, they don't. WifS could say "This is the game" but they haven't. While that's still an option, they should take it or do something to appease the "EE sucks" folks. Personally, I don't think it matters what they do because the most vocal will say, or scream, "NOT ENOUGH!!!" I just felt the "one EE only" was a compromise of sorts. No "surprise" EE, no multiple EE but users might get 1 for eternity. And if they have 2 EE quality, they wouldn't know which one.

MikeT has such a tenuous grip on logic that he's been named Sr, advisor for the trump administration. (Hits drum).

Posted by Trentonjoe on 2/14/2017 12:37:00 PM (view original):

Posted by npb7768 on 2/12/2017 5:24:00 PM (view original):
I recently got into two battles with the same nearby team over 2 local and probable EE players. For the most part, i led on one of the guys, and he led on the other. He won the first guy at 54% to 48%, both Very High. He continued to go hard after the 2nd guy and won that battle too. He did a great job outmaneuvering me, and i have no problem with my two losses. And he's a great guy too and a legendary owner.

Having said all that, the fact is that he went balls-out for 2 EE guys... and we all know that EE's can put owners at a disadvantage... so if he gets hosed on EE's in a couple of seasons, i will have little sympathy for him with his situation. I've come around to thinking that the EE set-up should stay as-is. Big Six high-prestige schools who deliberately stuff their fat faces at the pig feeding trough, while aware that they could get hosed with EE problems, should adjust, or accept their probable fate of getting hosed. Also want to note that this owner has never complained and is a nice, honest and straight-up guy.

I think this is high quality post.

This sounds like real life Kentucky under Cal