Cooperstown Historical Replay 1983 - FULL Topic

Thank You Contrarian23 for the great idea!
all the following was copied and pasted from contrarian's thread

Historical Replay League


I’ve always been interested in using WIS to complete a long-term historical replay. See this thread for a discussion I started over a year ago to explore the possibility.

The Cooperstown Historical Replay League is intended to fulfill that ambition. Rules will be explained in more detail in the next post, but first I want to provide some context.

WIS provides us with a database full of players going back to 1885. Every team that has appeared in the major leagues since then is here, including teams and players from three now-defunct leagues: the American Association (in the database from 1885-1891), the Player’s League (from its sole iteration in 1890), and the Federal League (from its two year stint in 1914-1915.)

So I’ve always been surprised that there aren’t more historical replay leagues. In fact, I’ve never seen one at all. I’m not talking about progressives, or twist themes, but a league where the idea is to replay each season in MLB history with the same rosters as the actual teams had that season.

The most important thing to know about this league:

There are a number of challenges with doing this, but foremost among them is probably this: every season there are a handful of teams that are doomed to be lousy and have no chance of competing. I have in mind a couple of ways of dealing with that, butthe first and most important thing to understand about this league is that some teams are not going to have any chance of winning in any given season. And you may end up with one of those teams.

Please read that previous paragraph as often as necessary, and make sure you are OK with this before signing up to join this league. This is a founding premise of this league: our primary purpose is to create an alternative historical narrative, to explore how things might have been, rather than to ensure that each owner has a decent chance to win in any given season. So we will not be giving lesser teams AAA, or twists, or free agents, or doing anything else to enhance competitive balance, and whining about this will not be tolerated at all.

Again, please fully understand this before signing up, as this fundamental principle is not subject to change. We will run the league as long as we have enough interested owners, but we will not alter this basic concept.
3/10/2017 12:00 PM
League Rules*

*some rules differ from the 1901 version and 1980 version.

OK, if you’ve come this far, then hopefully you’re comfortable with the premise that if you join this league there will be seasons where your team is just going to suck, and there will not be much that you can do about it. Hey, someone’s going to end up managing the 2003 Tigers.
Here’s how we we’re going to do this:
  1. The league will start with the 1980 MLB season and progress forward one season at a time.
  2. In season 1, once we have 26 owners, we will have a draft of the 26 MLB teams from 1980. Randomized draft order usingwww.random.org.
  3. For the 1980 season, we will use the 1977-1992 Format (7/7/6/6), which entails:
    1. 162 games
    2. 26 teams divided into 2 leagues and a total of 4 divisions
    3. 4 playoff teams (the 4 division winners; there is no wildcard in this format)
    4. No interleague play
  4. This is the way MLB was organized in 1980.
  5. The divisions will be arranged as they were in 1980.
  6. Subsequent seasons will use different formats, to reflect the way baseball changed over the years.
  7. Once you have chosen your team, you will go into the draft center and enter your actual players from that season. You can use the “load historical team” feature if you want…this is often the easiest and cleanest way to build your roster, but it’s not infallible. Occasionally players are missed when you load a team that way. If you prefer to draft your players individually, keep in mind that:
    1. For players who were traded or otherwise appeared for multiple teams in a single season, you MUST use the partial-season version of that player. If the player did not get enough PA or IP with your team to warrant a partial-season version then you cannot use him.
    2. All players who played for your team in real life, and are in the WIS database, must be on your roster.
    3. Only players who played for your team in real life may be used in games. This is important, because many teams, especially from the early years, do not have 25 players in the database. In such cases, you will draft additional $200,000 players from the database (from any 1980 season on) to fill out your roster, but these players MUST:
      1. Be manually set to rest at all times
      2. Be manually removed from your player rest, defensive replacement, and PH hierarchies.
    4. In other words, these non-roster players may not be used in games, unless WIS slots them in because of some sort of emergency, and owners should take every possible step to ensure that doesn’t happen.
    5. It is quite likely that some teams will be short of PA or IP, perhaps even very short. So be it.
  8. We will use “draft your own” AAA with the following parameters
    1. Each season, the theme rules will be set for a number of AAA players sufficient to allow the team with the largest real-life roster enough slots to incorporate all of their players.
    2. Teams that have more than 25 players in the WIS database will draft these additional players into AAA slots.These players MAY be used in games, and the transaction deadline will be set as late as possible to allow for roster moves throughout the season.
    3. Teams with unfilled AAA slots can either draft your own $200K players to fill the AAA slots, or just let WIS fill those slots with random AAA players, but in either case, those players MAY NOT be used in games. They should remain in AAA the entire season.
    4. Again, the purpose of AAA is to include as many real-life players as possible; no SIM-generated AAA players should ever be used in games in this league.
  9. By all means, do your best to win as many games as you can with the players you have! This is important for several reasons, including…
  10. …This is NOT a keeper league. Each season we will redraft from the pool of available teams. However, unlike with season 1, and unlike the 1900 and 1950 versions, these drafts will be weighted random (think NBA lottery). Instead, owners whose teams most overachieve in the current season will receive a greater likelihood of getting the highest draft picks for the next season. “Overachievement” will be defined as “greatest relative improvement in winning percentage.” Or for those who prefer a formula: (WIS winning percentage – MLB winning percentage)/MLB winning percentage. So, if you get stuck with a terrible team in year 1, fear not. If you can win a few more games than they did in real life, you’re probably in great shape to draw a better team in season 2. If, because of owner turnover, we have new owners in the league, they will draft last in their first season (we will use random.org to generate the order for new owners if there are more than one in any given season.)
  11. There will be real drafting strategy here. Do you pick the best remaining team available when it’s your turn? Or the team with the greatest possibility of improving on their real-life record?
  12. Obviously we are not allowing trades or waiver wire here. We will use the DH in the AL; if you rabidly hate the DH, please don’t let that dissuade you from joining.
3/10/2017 12:00 PM
Returning Owners (in no particular order):

1. dippedncrack
2. eddiedzen
3. gelfost
4. northof49
5. jkorn
6. tywebb3
7. sevenfifty5
8. bigfatjew
9. schwarze
10. rickysdad44
11. Chisock
12. loyalcanuck
13. jlvjr11
14. slainte
15. mfumar
16. llcoach
17. ff09
18. flippen
19. cholatse
20. lenbo1212
21. specsman

New Owners:
22. 84Champs
23. happyhours
24. burningcouch
25. redcped
26.


possible?
lenbo1212;

dippedncrack;eddiedzen;gelfost;northof49;jkorn;tywebb3;sevenfifty5;bigfatjew;schwarze;rickysdad44;Chisock;loyalcanuck;jlvjr11;slainte;mfumar;llcoach;ff09;flippen;lenbo1212;cholatse;84champs;happyhours;burningcouch;redcped
3/21/2017 7:18 PM (edited)
Draft order and lottery pending recovery of league info from 1982. Waiting to get info from Admin (waited too long and the league expired from my front page)
3/10/2017 12:05 PM (edited)
res
3/10/2017 12:00 PM
I'll join if you need another owner
3/10/2017 1:31 PM
Can i get on the waiting list please?
3/10/2017 3:47 PM
I'd join if room
3/10/2017 3:48 PM
84 champs, happyhours, and burningcouch - welcome! You are in.
3/10/2017 4:41 PM
cholatse returning - need 4 more
3/11/2017 2:46 PM
Bump
3/13/2017 7:17 AM
Posted by dippedncrack on 3/10/2017 12:05:00 PM (view original):
Draft order and lottery pending recovery of league info from 1982. Waiting to get info from Admin (waited too long and the league expired from my front page)
What was the outcome of your 1982 replay?

I had a board game in the 80s called Statis-Pro Baseball, and I spent many many years replaying the entire 1982 NL season. I had some intriguing differences, but I also had only my own manual effort at restricting innings/ABs to close to RL usage. Also, I was not 12 different managers with unique styles.

But my curiosity is piqued. I'd love to know how the league went. Am also particularly interested in how Leon Durham performed for the Cubbies. He majorly overperformed for me, and I have loved him ever since for it.

Oh, and I'll very likely play, too. Sorry I missed '82, but I love the idea.
3/13/2017 11:00 PM (edited)
i love statis pro.i still play it.i like the possibility of a player being injured for 88 games
3/13/2017 11:49 PM
Cooperstown Historical Replay 1982 Results
Division Team Owner Record Win Pct.
NL East Montreal Expos eddiedzen 102-60 0.63
NL East St. Louis Cardinals '82 jkorn 101-61 0.623
NL East Pittsburg Pirates sevenfifty5 88-74 0.543
NL East 1982 Phillies dlcunc31 87-75 0.537
NL East Chicago Cubs mfumar 67-95 0.414
NL East NY Metropolitans specsman 53-109 0.327
———
NL West Los Angeles Dodgers lenbo1212 93-69 0.574
NL West San Diego Padres gelfost 89-73 0.549
NL West Atlanta Braves slainte 86-76 0.531
NL West Houston Astros schwarze 81-81 0.5
NL West San Francisco Giants zephyr1949 66-96 0.407
NL West Cincinnati Reds ff09 59-103 0.364
———
AL East Baltimore Orioles rickysdad44 99-63 0.611
AL East Milwaukee Brewers tywebb3 97-65 0.599
AL East New York Yankees 1982 jfranco77 89-73 0.549
AL East Cleveland Indians loyalcanuck 83-79 0.512
AL East Motor City Kitties llcoach 78-84 0.481
AL East Boston Red Sox flippen 72-90 0.444
AL East Toronto Blue Jays cholatse 64-98 0.395
———
AL West California Angels dippedncrack 117-45 0.722
AL West Kansas City Royals Chisock 89-73 0.549
AL West Chicago White Sox bigfatjew 88-74 0.543
AL West Seattle Mariners jlvjr11 76-86 0.469
AL West Oakland A's farleyfustle 66-96 0.407
AL West Minnesota Twins northof49 61-101 0.377
AL West Texas Rangers 1982 sALat58 55-107 0.34
----
----
League Team Owner R1 Seed Overall Seed DCS LCS WS Playoff Result
NL Montreal Expos eddiedzen 1 1 0-0 4-1 4-3 WS Winner
NL Los Angeles Dodgers lenbo1212 2 2 0-0 1-4 0-0 Lost in LCS
AL California Angels dippedncrack 1 1 0-0 4-1 3-4 Lost in WS
AL Baltimore Orioles rickysdad44 2 2 0-0 1-4 0-0 Lost in LCS
3/13/2017 11:55 PM (edited)
Owner Team Player Season Bats G GS PA AB H Doubles Triples HR RBI R SO BB IBB SF SH HBP SB CS GIDP GIDPO Infield Hits Bunt Hits PH AB PH GB FB LOB RBI 2 Outs NP BA OBP SLG OPS IsoP SecA SB % GB/FB NP/PA RC RC/27
mfumar Chicago Cubs Leon Durham 1982 L 154 152 689 593 198 35 7 33 111 120 68 88 6 2 0 6 37 22 4 233 26 2 2 0 173 156 250 40 2421 0.334 0.424 0.583 1.007 0.25 0.423 62.7% 1.11 3.51 150.2 9.19
3/13/2017 11:57 PM
12 Next ▸
Cooperstown Historical Replay 1983 - FULL Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2024 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.