CHAOS!

Posted by gt_deuce on 3/31/2017 2:52:00 PM (view original):
Games simmed. Much ado about nothing, though it does lay bare the obsession I have with the game.

true i was hitting refresh a few times lol

Miami / FSU was a classic

I know this has been said many times...but a Final Four/playoff in D-1 sure would be nice.

Posted by sooners_81 on 3/31/2017 3:03:00 PM (view original):
Looks like 90% of the lower or unranked teams won today.

That seems to happen from time to time in this game and has for as long as I've been playing. The guy who got me into the game swore it was hard-coded into the game. I'll stop short of saying that, but it does seem to happen with more regularity than I would expect - widespread chaos that feels like more than some low-probability random statistical event.

Rankings are posted but no games yet. This is intense lol

Boom! My way to early pick to win the NC at D1A was Cal and they end the regular season #1! What a crazy season at D1A!

Posted by gt_deuce on 3/30/2017 7:14:00 PM (view original):
Undefeated CC winners tend to get a sizeable boost in the final rankings. It can make things very interesting.

I'll just leave this right here and slowly back away...................

Everyone predicted it! they took the a LONG route to get here but I predicted Oklahoma vs Cal in original post lol.

So easy, I don't know what all this fuss was about !!!

Well complete domination of a top 10 team probably helps also

I guess I'm just used to CJ's predictions always being wrong I thought it was hard to make correct pics....

That was pretty cool with the added drama of sim delay

Posted by truedevil33 on 3/31/2017 3:25:00 PM (view original):
I guess I'm just used to CJ's predictions always being wrong I thought it was hard to make correct pics....

???

I typically picked at least one team to make the NC correctly, some years I picked two. Out of every year, I picked 15 teams and out of those 15, 3 teams under-performed, 3 teams over-performed and I was dead-on with about 5. If you'd like to go back and see whose been more accurate on a consistent basis, I'd love to see the numbers.

Posted by cjsweat on 3/31/2017 3:34:00 PM (view original):

Posted by truedevil33 on 3/31/2017 3:25:00 PM (view original):
I guess I'm just used to CJ's predictions always being wrong I thought it was hard to make correct pics....

???

I typically picked at least one team to make the NC correctly, some years I picked two. Out of every year, I picked 15 teams and out of those 15, 3 teams under-performed, 3 teams over-performed and I was dead-on with about 5. If you'd like to go back and see whose been more accurate on a consistent basis, I'd love to see the numbers.

I would not like to do any of that. It was a complete joke that seemed to have gotten to you for whatever reason.

Posted by truedevil33 on 3/31/2017 3:40:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cjsweat on 3/31/2017 3:34:00 PM (view original):

Posted by truedevil33 on 3/31/2017 3:25:00 PM (view original):
I guess I'm just used to CJ's predictions always being wrong I thought it was hard to make correct pics....

???

I typically picked at least one team to make the NC correctly, some years I picked two. Out of every year, I picked 15 teams and out of those 15, 3 teams under-performed, 3 teams over-performed and I was dead-on with about 5. If you'd like to go back and see whose been more accurate on a consistent basis, I'd love to see the numbers.

I would not like to do any of that. It was a complete joke that seemed to have gotten to you for whatever reason.

No...I just don't understand how it's a joke.