Posted by thewizard17 on 4/18/2017 3:16:00 PM (view original):
since you opened your account in 2003, you started playing when you were 3? I'll just a little bit skeptical.

Posted by toddcommish on 4/18/2017 2:10:00 PM (view original):
You may have noticed that the majority of complaining and whining comes from millennials, who think that the world must cater to their every whim in order to maintain their "specialness" and general snowflake-like uniqueness.

The majority of the "STFU and take your medicine" is coming from the Boomers/GenX, who think the millennials need to get off their lawn and turn that damn music down.

Posted by MikeT23 on 4/18/2017 9:34:00 AM (view original):
My logic implies that you set a precedent when you ignore rules and policies. Nothing more, nothing less. And, unless I'm completely misunderstanding, it seems a lot of people in this thread would like to ignore set rules and policies to set a new precedent.

No?

Posted by texrangers25 on 4/18/2017 11:43:00 AM (view original):
If you could post one comment every 30 seconds it would take 17.3 days of not stop posting to catch up with MikeT23. All kidding aside Mike, you could probably make some serious cash being a spammer on facebook. :)

Posted by MikeT23 on 4/18/2017 6:17:00 PM (view original):

Posted by colonels19 on 4/18/2017 5:30:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 4/18/2017 9:34:00 AM (view original):
My logic implies that you set a precedent when you ignore rules and policies. Nothing more, nothing less. And, unless I'm completely misunderstanding, it seems a lot of people in this thread would like to ignore set rules and policies to set a new precedent.

No?

You would take $0 over $13 so I'm not sure why people are still arguing/conversing with you...you're just ignorant.

I don't jump thru hoops for a quarter a day. Since you're always shilling something on this site for your personal gain, I assume you will. You're a street beggar on the internet.

Posted by colonels19 on 4/18/2017 5:30:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 4/18/2017 9:34:00 AM (view original):
My logic implies that you set a precedent when you ignore rules and policies. Nothing more, nothing less. And, unless I'm completely misunderstanding, it seems a lot of people in this thread would like to ignore set rules and policies to set a new precedent.

No?

You would take $0 over $13 so I'm not sure why people are still arguing/conversing with you...you're just ignorant.

Posted by colonels19 on 4/18/2017 6:43:00 PM (view original):

Posted by colonels19 on 4/18/2017 5:30:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 4/18/2017 9:34:00 AM (view original):
My logic implies that you set a precedent when you ignore rules and policies. Nothing more, nothing less. And, unless I'm completely misunderstanding, it seems a lot of people in this thread would like to ignore set rules and policies to set a new precedent.

No?

You would take $0 over $13 so I'm not sure why people are still arguing/conversing with you...you're just ignorant.

God forbid I give away WIS GCs for my exploits...I'm much better for WIS than you are.

Posted by MikeT23 on 4/18/2017 9:48:00 AM (view original):
Breaking them would benefit me, and everyone I assume, but, if I was WifS, I wouldn't do it. Because of this:

User 1 relinquishes the job
Users 1 and 2 apply for the job
User 2 is more qualified than User 1, but neither are sufficiently qualified
The gig goes to a sim

If they now give the gig to user 1, who (unjustifiably or not) is less qualified than user 2, then i can see why it would upset user 2. "hey, i got rejected from this job and took a worse post - but i have a better resume than the coach who you gave the job to!"


Without question, this would happen every season in every world and, quite possibly, multiple times. CS wouldn't have time for anything else HD-related and, undoubtedly, would make the wrong call, in someone's mind, every time. Can of worms I wouldn't open.