Posted by sjpoker on 6/29/2017 9:10:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 6/29/2017 7:23:00 PM (view original):
Posted by sjpoker on 6/29/2017 7:12:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 6/29/2017 5:57:00 PM (view original):
Posted by tecwrg on 6/29/2017 5:51:00 PM (view original):
You should have checked out before you started with the Hunter / Radke comparison.
You're not even willing to do a comparison. Your ability to think critically begins and ends with "what people thought 40 years ago."
Your ability to think is confined to Bill James articles and Microsoft Excel.
You're being ridiculous. In any other situation, if someone asked you to compare two pitchers, you'd go to their BR page and look at the stats.
I'm perfectly willing to listen to an argument as to why Hunter was better than Mussina, but you'll actually have to make the argument using facts. Not bullshit like "Hunter was the most coveted pitcher in baseball" and "40 years ago people thought Hunter was really good."
I'm not making that argument. All I said was you can't ignore that Hunter was a top pitcher in his ERA and Mussina was a 1A pitcher in his ERA. Stats won't show you that.
Was Hunter a top pitcher in his era?
He had three very good years and the rest were average to bad.
Seaver, Palmer, Perry, Carlton, Gibson, & Tiant, to name a few, all pitched in Hunter's era. He wasn't better than them.