Posted by MikeT23 on 7/21/2017 6:15:00 PM (view original):

Posted by beachhouse on 7/21/2017 6:02:00 PM (view original):
well this got awkward...

It did. But here's the thing: People got so fed up with our political divide that they voted TRUMP into office. Who in the hell saw that coming? Now people want to blame the divide on TRUMP because he acted like a clown during the campaign. But that's enough political talk.

thewizard17 is a filthy cheater. But not worthy of death. That's a little over the top. Castration, like I suggested earlier, seems fair.

Posted by thewizard17 on 7/21/2017 5:21:00 PM (view original):

Posted by kcsundevil on 7/21/2017 5:19:00 PM (view original):

Posted by thewizard17 on 7/21/2017 5:13:00 PM (view original):

Posted by byeags25 on 7/21/2017 3:39:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/21/2017 2:20:00 PM (view original):
Let's hash this out.

What's unfair about playing slowdown vs uptempo?

I gotta ask too b/c I have seen you post this multiple times. What is unfair about playing slowdown vs uptempo?

I was responding to a post to MikeT about unfairness.

I was making a point. I don't think it's unfair. But for those that say my tactic is unfair, I can come back and say that slowdown vs uptempo is unfair, but not from a lack of sportsmanship from the coach. It's part of the game and I've accepted it. I've admitted my tactic was unsportsmanlike.Everyone has their own definition of "unfair".

To answer your question, I've played against teams with 9 or 10 players with a lower stamina that have played slowdown and yet they are still in green with 4 minutes left in the game. Definitely not the way the game has intended to work, if according to WIS they are trying to make for a realistic game. So because it's a possible programming error, does that mean those that play slow down are exploiting a glitch? Should the number of turnovers be increased per possession if a team is playing slow down since there are more passes needed to beat the press and more of the shot clock used?

So everyone has their own definition of unfairness. I can comeback and say the slowdown is a glitch, just like anyone else can say the WE bug was a glitch.

Through its silence, WIS is endorsing this nonsensical stance.

Right, but as previously mentioned, I didn't see anything that said WIS support would post on the forums for a resolution or sitemail anyone specifically. It said it would take action if needed.

Posted by fd343ny on 7/21/2017 8:18:00 PM (view original):

Posted by thewizard17 on 7/21/2017 5:21:00 PM (view original):

Posted by kcsundevil on 7/21/2017 5:19:00 PM (view original):

Posted by thewizard17 on 7/21/2017 5:13:00 PM (view original):

Posted by byeags25 on 7/21/2017 3:39:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/21/2017 2:20:00 PM (view original):
Let's hash this out.

What's unfair about playing slowdown vs uptempo?

I gotta ask too b/c I have seen you post this multiple times. What is unfair about playing slowdown vs uptempo?

I was responding to a post to MikeT about unfairness.

I was making a point. I don't think it's unfair. But for those that say my tactic is unfair, I can come back and say that slowdown vs uptempo is unfair, but not from a lack of sportsmanship from the coach. It's part of the game and I've accepted it. I've admitted my tactic was unsportsmanlike.Everyone has their own definition of "unfair".

To answer your question, I've played against teams with 9 or 10 players with a lower stamina that have played slowdown and yet they are still in green with 4 minutes left in the game. Definitely not the way the game has intended to work, if according to WIS they are trying to make for a realistic game. So because it's a possible programming error, does that mean those that play slow down are exploiting a glitch? Should the number of turnovers be increased per possession if a team is playing slow down since there are more passes needed to beat the press and more of the shot clock used?

So everyone has their own definition of unfairness. I can comeback and say the slowdown is a glitch, just like anyone else can say the WE bug was a glitch.

Through its silence, WIS is endorsing this nonsensical stance.

Right, but as previously mentioned, I didn't see anything that said WIS support would post on the forums for a resolution or sitemail anyone specifically. It said it would take action if needed.

they said - in the threads they deleted - that they would make an announcement when done. They have made no announcement and deleted the threads.

utter disregard of users.

if they had balls, they would announce what they decided to do. Silence is gutless and adds to customer frustration

Posted by kcsundevil on 7/21/2017 8:15:00 AM (view original):

Posted by kcsundevil on 7/20/2017 8:41:00 PM (view original):

Posted by Benis on 7/20/2017 7:22:00 PM (view original):
They did delete it. HA.

Not your fault, WIS_Support is as fickle as it is sassy.

Still waiting on that explanation of the redshirt glitch resolution, WIS. Maybe today?

Maybe today?

Posted by l80r20 on 7/22/2017 10:33:00 AM (view original):
Summary to date:
wizard ... cheated big time, got caught, got exposed big time, and his "defense" is to post greater and greater nonsense.
WIS ... crickets.

This isn't progress.

Posted by Benis on 7/22/2017 10:58:00 AM (view original):
I'll give them at least a LITTLE credit. People were crying and crying "fix the loophole NOW!!!" and they actually did. I'm still shocked at how quickly they did it honestly.

Posted by kcsundevil on 7/22/2017 9:48:00 AM (view original):

Posted by kcsundevil on 7/21/2017 8:15:00 AM (view original):

Posted by kcsundevil on 7/20/2017 8:41:00 PM (view original):

Posted by Benis on 7/20/2017 7:22:00 PM (view original):
They did delete it. HA.

Not your fault, WIS_Support is as fickle as it is sassy.

Still waiting on that explanation of the redshirt glitch resolution, WIS. Maybe today?

Maybe today?

Maybe today?