I definitely should have taken KD. I'm not sure why I didn't. CP3 would have been the 2nd best choice. I definitely screwed up for several reasons I might get into later, but George gives me a nice DReb% at SG... so there's 1 positive even if I screwed up... Not too stoked on my 2nd round options. Thanks for putting the table together. The $/min is something WIS should add to the basketball draft center

Posted by milest on 8/3/2017 10:44:00 PM (view original):
I definitely should have taken KD. I'm not sure why I didn't. CP3 would have been the 2nd best choice. I definitely screwed up for several reasons I might get into later, but George gives me a nice DReb% at SG... so there's 1 positive even if I screwed up... Not too stoked on my 2nd round options. Thanks for putting the table together. The $/min is something WIS should add to the basketball draft center

Them not including TO% is by the far the stupidest to me... but there are lots of things they could add. I know this is an unorthodox method of team measurement but I thought it would be fun to show.

Also, you are up dude!

These measurements are far from perfect. They are a means to sort data but every decision needs more analysis. For example, I thought Otto Porter was a FANTASTIC pick but because of he low usage and, low assists, mediocre defense, he will always show up low on these holistic measurements.

I have 3 of the top 10 ...
a shame that never translates into greatness
Ill have the usually decent team - then get upset in the first round (again)

I'm reasonably happy with Bledsoe and Towns. I have usage, very good rebounding, FTA's, and Towns helps with Bledsoe's relative inefficiency. Could've done better, could've done worse. So it goes.

Right now, I like CJOK's first team with Lopez and the Greek!

;-)

Mason Plumlee was a very nice pick. 2nd round value