Posted by MikeT23 on 8/7/2017 8:40:00 PM (view original):
Virtually everyone here says they want to play against human competition. What other incentive is required to play in conferences with humans?
You're grossly exaggerating the number of coaches that want to play against humans now. Case and point, look at Rupp. There's an entire thread dedicated to trying to fill that world, specifically D1. After two seasons of advertising and trying to gain steam the entire world is up a whopping 13 coaches (+13 at D1, -2 at D2, +2 at D3).
For comparison, about 3-4 years ago Wooden was the dominant D3 world in HD. They had 7 super-conferences and a few other half-full ones. When D3 users saw how much fun that was there was a movement to do the same thing in Naismith. Naismith (D3) went from virtually empty to something like 9 super-conferences in just a few seasons. Part of the reason for the influx was the world was so empty it was a race to get your conference to the top and the other part was the incentive to do so-extra recruiting money. In less than 4 seasons Naismith over-took Wooden as the supreme D3 world and that was without a thread on the forums. Further, they remained relatively full (as far as what "relatively full" means in this game) until the update rolled out, then it became a ghost town again.
Long story short not nearly as many people want to play against humans anymore because the motivation/incentive is gone.