8/16/2017 5:36 PM
8/16/2017 5:36 PM
Guess we shouldn't have helped the Iraqi's pull down statues

It's an important part of their history and heritage

How many Americans cheered them on?
8/16/2017 5:37 PM
bronxcheer's favorite statue:

8/16/2017 5:40 PM
Stalin and Lenin statues were taken down as well.
8/16/2017 5:41 PM
I LAUGH AT HIS TINY PEE-PEE!
8/16/2017 5:42 PM
Posted by bronxcheer on 8/16/2017 5:42:00 PM (view original):
I LAUGH AT HIS TINY PEE-PEE!
Why do you talk about yourself in 3rd person?
8/16/2017 5:46 PM
8/16/2017 5:48 PM
8/16/2017 5:49 PM
8/16/2017 5:56 PM
8/16/2017 8:39 PM
8/16/2017 8:40 PM
TOO MANY DEMONAZIS TO NAME!

TOO MANY DEMONAZI STATUES TO TEAR DOWN!

CLEANSE THE NATION MR. PRESIDENT!
8/16/2017 8:54 PM

DEMOCRATS

Dinesh D'Souza: The secret history of the Democratic Party

Editor's note: The following column is excerpted from Dinesh D'Souza's new book, "Hillary's America: The Secret History of the Democratic Party" (Regnery Publishing, July 18, 2016).

Contrary to what we learn from progressives in education and the media, the history of the Democratic Party well into the twentieth century is a virtually uninterrupted history of thievery, corruption and bigotry. American history is the story of Democratic malefactors and Republican heroes. Yes, it’s true.

I begin with Andrew Jackson. He—not Thomas Jefferson or FDR—is the true founder of the modern Democratic Party. Progressives today are divided about Jackson. Some, like historian Sean Wilentz, admire him, while others want to remove him from the $20 bill because he was a slaveowner and a vicious Indian fighter. He was, in this view, a very bad American.

I support the debunking of Jackson, but not because he was a bad American—rather, because he was a typical crooked Democrat. Jackson established the Democratic Party as the party of theft. He mastered the art of stealing land from the Indians and then selling it at giveaway prices to white settlers. Jackson’s expectation was that those people would support him politically, as indeed they did. Jackson was indeed a “man of the people,” but his popularity was that of a gang leader who distributes his spoils in exchange for loyalty on the part of those who benefit from his crimes.

8/16/2017 8:54 PM

The Democrats were also the party of slavery, and the slave-owning mentality continues to shape the policies of Democratic leaders today. The point isn’t that the Democrats invented slavery which is an ancient institution that far predates America. Rather, Democrats like Senator John C. Calhoun invented a new justification for slavery, slavery as a “positive good.” For the first time in history, Democrats insisted that slavery wasn’t just beneficial for masters; they said it was also good for the slaves.

Today progressive pundits attempt to conceal Democratic complicity in slavery by blaming slavery on the “South.” These people have spun a whole history that portrays the slavery battle as one between the anti-slavery North and the pro-slavery South. This of course benefits Democrats today, because today the Democratic Party’s main strength is in the north and the Republican Party’s main strength is in the South.

8/16/2017 8:57 PM
123 Next ▸

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2024 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.