I'd like to see injuries make a return as well, but with one of the following adjustments made:
1) Keep the occurrence rate and severity/length of injuries the way they were before (which was pretty nut-crunching, imho) but increase roster size (by 4 or 5 players, say);
2) Keep roster size the same and decrease the the rate and severity/length of injuries (out # of quarters vs out # games, say); or
3) A little increase in roster size (2 or 3) and a little reduction in injury rate/severity (out 1, maybe 2 games).
My preference would be for either option #1 or #3, as I've always felt a roster size of 50 players was low. In addition to injury considerations, an increased roster size along with a requisite increase in the size of the pool of recruits,would, I think, especially at the higher divisions, increase the real world feel of the game and give coaches at the Boise States of the world a greater chance of building a winner through player development.
8/23/2017 12:08 PM (edited)