I can't go down the whole list because it stops at #1.
It starts with #1.
I'm still waiting for someone to explain to me.
Global warming? Maybe.
Man made? Minimal to the point of insignificance.
Model? I saw a few. Each different. Not one I could explain.
NOW, if I was trying to sell man-made global warming, I would make it very simple AND back it up with historical evidence.
What I have encountered is a flawed model over emphasizing CO2 and excluding H2O.
I got mumbo jumbo presented as settled science. I got plenty of scientists who would disagree.
And we have multiple historical evidence examples to not only challenge, but HONESTLY refute these accusations.
I WOULD HOWEVER back any claim, by the left, on simple POLLUTION. Plastics, recycle, etc.
WE ON THE RIGHT support the war on pollution.