Assuming this is the issue, it's interesting that HoJo's (and other old cookies) counter is still so much higher than the players being used more frequently now. In a way, it's a victory for dynamic pricing (once it's implemented correctly) because it shows that, back then, there was much less variation among team rosters and that the new system makes it difficult for the "best" choices to become known quantities in the same way that they were back then. It makes the game more about skill and less about following a recipe.

With that said, definitely important that we get this fixed so that it can work as intended.

has anyone made admin aware of this issue?

also - is someone able to explain to me how and why the top riser goes up 2 mil plus and the top faller goes down 28k?

Posted by mildnhazy on 10/26/2017 3:19:00 PM (view original):
has anyone made admin aware of this issue?

Yes, I sent in a ticket after seble took over and he said it's on their radar

Posted by mildnhazy on 10/26/2017 3:19:00 PM (view original):
has anyone made admin aware of this issue?

I sent a ticket earlier today and got a response to please elaborate, which I just did. We'll see.

Posted by mildnhazy on 10/26/2017 3:21:00 PM (view original):
also - is someone able to explain to me how and why the top riser goes up 2 mil plus and the top faller goes down 28k?

Because of their arbitrary rule that the total amount of the player pool salary must stay the same. So the handful of huge salary increases gets divided by the multitudes of undraftable players, ergo small decreases for them.

thanks. Seems like they were pretty careless with dynamic pricing. Which isn't a surprise based on everything else.

Ya, the concept is good, but something like resetting the counter each time seems pretty obvious. Missing that seems like they just viewed this as a bone they were throwing us and hoping we'd be content with it as is.

I doubt it was intentional. From a coding perspective, something like that is an unfortunately easy mistake to make without noticing at first

I don't think it was intentional. I think it was careless. There have been several price adjustments and no one has bothered to check to ensure it was functioning as it should. It seems like any upgrade on this site is done at the behest and prodding of the users. There is no pride or desire within the developers themselves to improve.

C'est la FOX -- hopefully things will change with this new team once seble has everything in place

This was the response to the email I sent: "Thanks for the feedback. We plan to review the salary logic, hopefully before the next update."

Same

Yeah, there's just way too much regularity across the board, from quarter to quarter.

Posted by ArlenWilliam on 10/26/2017 1:17:00 PM (view original):
I agree.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=806en-DvQe4