Posted by bathtubhippo on 11/4/2017 2:56:00 PM (view original):
I think a fair argument could be made that those auto-scholarship players should at least be superior to walk-ons, though. That's hardly a big ask. I mean, they don't need to be good...but come on. It might also help newer players at lower levels.
I agree a fair argument could be made here, and I also think a fair argument could be made that the "penalty" for not filling your roster isn't strong enough. Which is right? I suppose that depends on your perspective and what you'd like the game to be.
The bottom line is that you and I could probably both create a list of things we think could be done to improve the game. Some would be more important than others but at the end of the day we would probably both have different ideas of what is most important; what should and shouldn't be fixed; and why. Add a 1000+ other users into that equation with their ideas and the waters become even more muddied.
So it still comes down to the fact that until Sports Hub decides to pay attention to the game, these arguments are all moot, and even when they do decide to pay attention to the game, they may still be moot.
Edited to change "that" to "we think" in the second paragraph.
11/4/2017 3:31 PM (edited)