What about Chipper? Topic

Posted by MikeT23 on 11/21/2017 8:40:00 AM (view original):
I asked you a dozen questions yesterday. Every last one was answered with a question. Now you expect me to answer your questions? LOL. You forgot your role in the relationship.
I answered your first one. Then asked you a question. Then YOU answered it with a dozen questions.
11/21/2017 9:37 AM
I'll have to take your word on it. I don't keep a file on our exchanges. What did I post on this day in 2014?
11/21/2017 9:40 AM
It was yesterday. The “file” is a thread a slot or two below this one.

Also, don’t be mad at me because you have issues with a google search. You’re old. Technology isn’t your thing.
11/21/2017 9:45 AM
Posted by Jtpsops on 11/21/2017 9:37:00 AM (view original):
Based on what? Edgar beats Ortiz in BA, OBP, OPS, OPS+, K rate, BB rate.

Ortiz was great. But it's foolish to blindly state he was better than Edgar. I'd say they're close to even. They were just different types of hitters.
He is better in terms of World Series rings.

In the post season Edgar hit .266 and SLG .508, Papi hit .289 with SLG of .543 and without him the Sox don't win in 2004 or 2013 when he hit .688 and the rest of the team his .167

Also, naked eye test: Papi was better. Just ask the Yankees fans who they feared more.
11/21/2017 9:52 AM
Posted by bad_luck on 11/21/2017 9:45:00 AM (view original):
It was yesterday. The “file” is a thread a slot or two below this one.

Also, don’t be mad at me because you have issues with a google search. You’re old. Technology isn’t your thing.
Dogs get mad. People get angry.
11/21/2017 9:52 AM
I don't get mad or angry at the internet. I can walk away from this forum when I travel and not miss a thing? You still in Dallas, BL?
11/21/2017 9:57 AM
Posted by cccp1014 on 11/21/2017 9:52:00 AM (view original):
Posted by Jtpsops on 11/21/2017 9:37:00 AM (view original):
Based on what? Edgar beats Ortiz in BA, OBP, OPS, OPS+, K rate, BB rate.

Ortiz was great. But it's foolish to blindly state he was better than Edgar. I'd say they're close to even. They were just different types of hitters.
He is better in terms of World Series rings.

In the post season Edgar hit .266 and SLG .508, Papi hit .289 with SLG of .543 and without him the Sox don't win in 2004 or 2013 when he hit .688 and the rest of the team his .167

Also, naked eye test: Papi was better. Just ask the Yankees fans who they feared more.
Rings probably do influence voters, though they shouldn't. By that logic, Tim Lincecum has been better throughout his career than Clayton Kershaw.
11/21/2017 9:57 AM
Posted by all3 on 11/20/2017 4:55:00 PM (view original):
Now that he's on the ballot, please discus if Chipper Jones is a HOF player. I mean, he was certainly no Scott Rolen, but does he deserve getting in?
To me Chipper is a certain HOFer. He was a top player in his era who was a true gamer.
11/21/2017 9:58 AM
Posted by MikeT23 on 11/21/2017 9:57:00 AM (view original):
I don't get mad or angry at the internet. I can walk away from this forum when I travel and not miss a thing? You still in Dallas, BL?
Denver. It’s not like I’m on vacation. I’m working.

My favorite miket is too-good-for-this miket.
11/21/2017 10:05 AM
I don't think Mike has failed to appear on this forum for even a day since he joined the site.
11/21/2017 10:18 AM
Posted by bad_luck on 11/21/2017 10:05:00 AM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 11/21/2017 9:57:00 AM (view original):
I don't get mad or angry at the internet. I can walk away from this forum when I travel and not miss a thing? You still in Dallas, BL?
Denver. It’s not like I’m on vacation. I’m working.

My favorite miket is too-good-for-this miket.
I know you log my posts. I was out of town Fri-Sat last week. Did I post?

Nonetheless, I recall you posting from the backseat on your way to a ski trip. Sounds like a vacation. Gonna deny that?
11/21/2017 10:20 AM
Posted by MikeT23 on 11/21/2017 10:20:00 AM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 11/21/2017 10:05:00 AM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 11/21/2017 9:57:00 AM (view original):
I don't get mad or angry at the internet. I can walk away from this forum when I travel and not miss a thing? You still in Dallas, BL?
Denver. It’s not like I’m on vacation. I’m working.

My favorite miket is too-good-for-this miket.
I know you log my posts. I was out of town Fri-Sat last week. Did I post?

Nonetheless, I recall you posting from the backseat on your way to a ski trip. Sounds like a vacation. Gonna deny that?
Oh wait...we’re allowed to remember past posts now?

I swear someone was just saying something about not “keeping a file.”
11/21/2017 10:28 AM
Posted by Jtpsops on 11/21/2017 9:57:00 AM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 11/21/2017 9:52:00 AM (view original):
Posted by Jtpsops on 11/21/2017 9:37:00 AM (view original):
Based on what? Edgar beats Ortiz in BA, OBP, OPS, OPS+, K rate, BB rate.

Ortiz was great. But it's foolish to blindly state he was better than Edgar. I'd say they're close to even. They were just different types of hitters.
He is better in terms of World Series rings.

In the post season Edgar hit .266 and SLG .508, Papi hit .289 with SLG of .543 and without him the Sox don't win in 2004 or 2013 when he hit .688 and the rest of the team his .167

Also, naked eye test: Papi was better. Just ask the Yankees fans who they feared more.
Rings probably do influence voters, though they shouldn't. By that logic, Tim Lincecum has been better throughout his career than Clayton Kershaw.
Did you miss the postseason stats aspect of my post? Without him they don't have the rings. I didn't realize Lincecum and Kershaw were HoF candidates.
11/21/2017 10:32 AM
Sure, you can remember stuff. Why wouldn't you? I'm just not going to search for it. So, since you didn't deny it, I can only assume you will post while on vacation.

The other strange one, that I recall, was when you said, "If I know I'm going to have a busy day at work, I'll post before I leave the house". Which is odd because how would the rest of us make it thru the day if we didn't get your daily insight?
11/21/2017 10:32 AM
Posted by cccp1014 on 11/21/2017 10:32:00 AM (view original):
Posted by Jtpsops on 11/21/2017 9:57:00 AM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 11/21/2017 9:52:00 AM (view original):
Posted by Jtpsops on 11/21/2017 9:37:00 AM (view original):
Based on what? Edgar beats Ortiz in BA, OBP, OPS, OPS+, K rate, BB rate.

Ortiz was great. But it's foolish to blindly state he was better than Edgar. I'd say they're close to even. They were just different types of hitters.
He is better in terms of World Series rings.

In the post season Edgar hit .266 and SLG .508, Papi hit .289 with SLG of .543 and without him the Sox don't win in 2004 or 2013 when he hit .688 and the rest of the team his .167

Also, naked eye test: Papi was better. Just ask the Yankees fans who they feared more.
Rings probably do influence voters, though they shouldn't. By that logic, Tim Lincecum has been better throughout his career than Clayton Kershaw.
Did you miss the postseason stats aspect of my post? Without him they don't have the rings. I didn't realize Lincecum and Kershaw were HoF candidates.
You're using rings to compare two players' value. It's retarded.

.266/.508 is really not that far off from .289/.543. Papi also had way better teams.
11/21/2017 10:34 AM
◂ Prev 1|2|3|4|5|6...9 Next ▸
What about Chipper? Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2024 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.