Posted by zorzii on 1/5/2018 6:13:00 PM (view original):
Honestly, no idea why you lost to Delaware. Against SIMS, I go +1 always, and I set adjustments to if losing. Your 96 per would be +2 3pts if I was coaching your team. I think I would of doubled his 100lp just to give him no chance of a win...
Yea, I did double “always” for Clark (100 LP guy) and double “if leading scorer” for Conception (86 Per) & Acosta (92 Per). I played them -1 because a) their best player is a low post guy, b) they’ve only shot 30% from 3 on the year, and c) because i’m already a 3-2 defense so I figured I already cover the outside a bit more than inside as is. I’m curious is it’s my distro’s that are wrong or something. I’ve heard multiple theories on how to set them. The most I assign to anyone is 12 (Almaraz - 67/96 LP/Per & Morgan 72/72 LP/Per). Losses like this one to Deleware are common for me and I’m still trying to figure out why. Then playing human teams, even ones I’m clearly more talented than, I lose to superior coaches. I guess to summarize my post is to ask what makes a coach better than another? What did craigsmith45 (coach at Minnesota) do to beat me that I’m not aware of? Thanks for the feedback though, Zorzii.