I have no skin in that game, but please tell me you don't honestly think a player would take payment from another team to intentionally miss a tackle in the off chance it came down to a possible game winning play? This kind of conspiracy nonsense is just that, nonsense. People screw up and miss tackles--it sucks if your guy misses it and its great if your team benefits from it. That same guy had a big interception earlier in the game, would he have tried for the INT if he was being paid off by the Vikings? This one passes the sniff test easily. Did you lose a lot of money on the game or something?