Posted by The Taint on 2/8/2018 12:29:00 AM (view original):
Seriously, think about it...in a country of 10, 1 case of cancer would probably wipe out everyone's income.
Not quite because many cannot pay. You are under the impression that pf the 350mil that the majority pay into it and a smaller % get the healthcare. That may work in India where the average age is 27? Our population is aging and there are fewer doctors.
In a country of 10 you only need 1 MD to service the 10 persons including themselves. In a country of 1000 where medicine is socialized and the MDs don't get paid as much as they feel they deserve you will likely have fewer MDs. So instead of 1 for every 10 you have 1 for every 50 and now the line to see the aforementioned MD takes longer and people could die waiting.
Lastly, in nationalized healthcare people don't pay into healthcare so the # of people is actually easier if there are fewer of them. In Spain for instance there are 45mil people. Their individual tax rate is 51%...so they basically work 6 months for the Gov't. But their healthcare is 100% free and education is mostly inexpensive. Their military is not exactly the best in the world. Now if Spain were 350 million people I am not sure that would work.
I am all for Nationalized healthcare so long as I can see the stats that illustrate there would be enough doctors and how the budget would work. Instead of paying into it just raise everyone's taxes. But they can't because they just lowered everyone's taxes. In the US, the insurance companies have way too much pull IMO. And we have too many frivolous lawsuits vs. MDs. The system needs an overhaul. I agree 100%.