it didn't when I did that way back when - just got seble all stirred up in his feelings - last time he did anything for the sim I think


{p.s. I agree with the auto-correct seble is misspelled - should be a-hole}

Posted by copernicus on 3/19/2018 12:36:00 AM (view original):

Posted by bds9992 on 3/19/2018 12:13:00 AM (view original):

Posted by copernicus on 3/18/2018 11:53:00 PM (view original):

Ibaka was necessary, but now I’m worried about your scoring.

because 14 pts of usage with one more position to draft is not enough?

because you only have one player above 22 Usg%, you know Nets Kidd isn’t efficient, and we’re running out of guys that would still give you an edge in the passing department (and 70+ D). I believe you’re going to have to sacrifice.....unless a certain guy falls. Even then, I worry, because that guy’s usage isn’t so high.

Jokic is actually a {23.5} 4 pt guy at efg 60% {and oh yeah, 20 as%!) - the more you know....

Low minutes. My bad - take your snark back to the dungeon from whence it came - but you are light on threes and Ibaka doesn’t help with passing.

You two are class acts. I do something no one else will do, I run ODL for six seasons with a steady hand and y’all treat me like I’m Donald Trump.

Ash, beat it, bro. Go back to prog land.

you're being very un-dude, dude - I'm allowed to cordially disagree with you, which is all that I'm doing {no name calling, nor denigrations} - I do have some knowledge and some experience worth mention which you might maybe could benefit from - anyway peace bro, I just disagree and thought this thread was about that kind of discussion

also p.s.: have totally done extra credit evals many times for fun (and if you're not doing it for fun wtf?) - just shake it off, kid

I'm not treating you like an idiot because you ran the odl for 6 seasons. I'm treating you like an idiot because you're way out of your league, don't know what the hell you're talking about, and won't back down when multiple owners who do know better tell you otherwise.

Basically, I'm treating you the way you are asking to be treated. Good luck this season, friend. If you ever want to change that gooseegg to a 1, ask somebody else or do some reading.

<3

No, it’s because I don’t agree with the Greek god of the SIM.

Bow down.

I’ve been around since 2008. I’ve learned from failure.

Get lost, man. Retire. We don’t need you to win any more championships. You should congratulate yourself for gracing us with your presence, then fade into the sunset like sly.

please

damn, been around 10 years and ain't learned very much.

Posted by bds9992 on 3/19/2018 1:03:00 AM (view original):

Sums up everything you know very nicely right there.

Posted by ashamael on 3/19/2018 12:59:00 AM (view original):
damn, been around 10 years and ain't learned very much.

You have no reason to be on this thread. You’re a troll, that’s all.

matter of fact, you have no reason to be on this site. You’ve already graced us with your divine knowledge. Why don’t you just go?

But hey, I'm going to leave you alone now. Go reread monkee's last post about discussion/not taking **** personally. See ya over in the tepl.

Do you have a temple dedicated to your divinity?

Does your religion have a special day?

Is it a Wednesday? .......

Let's break it up and everyone scream at me because I didn't randomly guess the right season for the guy you picked:

Row Labels	Count Plyrs	Avg Per%	Avg Mid%	Avg Pnt%	Sum Usg%	Avg eFG%	Sum Oreb%	Sum Dreb%	Sum Ast%	Avg TO%	Sum Fl/48	Sum 3PM	Sum 3PA	Avg Def	Sum Sal
gerryred	4	16	40	44	87.7	56.1	29.5	67.0	75.2	15.7	13	285	719	62	$ 34,371,908
seapilots	4	19	38	43	96.3	55.5	26.7	69.0	78.7	15.4	15	380	914	75	$ 31,885,603
dh555	3	13	42	45	77.5	55.7	23.8	57.1	50.8	14.2	11	185	492	70	$ 26,673,616
pointfwd	3	14	38	48	82.2	55.0	22.9	51.1	47.7	11.4	10	172	422	80	$ 24,613,563
ncoldguy	4	8	34	59	84.8	55.1	39.2	63.5	46.7	15.6	18	119	354	88	$ 30,921,272
milest	3	23	32	44	70.8	53.6	26.4	46.0	53.2	14.6	8	325	856	72	$ 25,157,248
pharrop	3	13	41	47	69.1	51.2	21.8	55.9	54.6	13.6	8	179	508	78	$ 26,400,807
uptowngbv	4	23	32	46	96.1	52.3	28.4	78.9	68.0	13.6	13	445	1273	75	$ 31,167,261
24kpyrite	3	2	42	56	75.9	56.1	26.8	49.8	36.5	10.5	12	30	116	72	$ 26,529,061
twinsfan8791	3	24	28	48	65.3	56.6	19.0	50.3	60.4	15.2	8	253	589	64	$ 26,595,105
pexetera	3	7	32	61	65.8	60.3	28.7	65.9	22.1	10.4	11	99	302	83	$ 25,153,584
superrobb420	3	16	44	40	84.5	54.5	17.8	59.9	37.6	11.1	10	218	629	84	$ 25,293,235
robusk	3	13	30	56	67.4	57.6	28.0	55.3	40.1	13.5	11	140	361	73	$ 24,538,884
mikee1	3	29	33	38	74.2	54.0	20.7	55.3	36.0	11.9	10	368	972	79	$ 25,485,451
benhoidal	3	18	26	56	73.1	56.4	23.8	71.5	39.6	14.5	12	195	486	79	$ 21,495,267
ysw128	4	9	43	49	89.5	53.4	31.0	83.3	64.6	14.9	16	122	343	72	$ 24,959,388
rubnsly	3	17	30	52	68.5	56.6	18.6	61.2	46.7	15.4	10	200	512	79	$ 23,113,155
jkaye24	3	19	35	46	66.8	55.7	27.2	60.7	23.6	13.1	11	271	650	89	$ 23,438,165
Midge	3	0	39	60	63.0	59.7	30.0	62.3	21.7	11.7	12	2	13	91	$ 25,719,612
copernicus	3	26	32	42	66.5	56.9	22.0	66.5	65.7	16.8	11	222	562	69	$ 20,762,957
bds9992	3	30	32	38	65.1	56.4	16.6	51.6	59.9	13.9	9	534	1206	71	$ 21,141,484
jcred5	3	10	36	54	83.2	52.1	23.6	68.1	49.9	10.6	10	134	389	74	$ 23,930,523
sappy	3	18	37	45	64.6	53.9	20.1	60.8	50.1	16.2	10	239	594	73	$ 22,798,916
cjok1051	2	17	29	55	48.8	56.7	17.7	32.8	47.3	15.4	7	126	371	60	$ 17,898,953

Later in the rounds I can start adjusting the numbers for percent of minute played, usage, etc. It is more useful for this context. If I get around to it. It is a little easier to get around to that now when I am not responsible for doing the write-ups.

I think you got my Kidd wrong because of what I call the 'Deandre' rule of "who gives a **** what 1 pt usage guy's efg is" but otherwise very impressive

Posted by copernicus on 3/19/2018 1:12:00 AM (view original):
I think you got my Kidd wrong because of what I call the 'Deandre' rule of "who gives a **** what 1 pt usage guy's efg is" but otherwise very impressive

Yeah. It is some general logic I wrote for selecting the "supposed" best player for each selection with some salary cap weighting. It generally does pretty good. I personally feel like it doesn't do as good of a job for someone like Wilt with such high variation between the type of player he was across his career. The thing is pretty useful for trying to get a flavor of the competition or writing evals though.

Anyway, it likes the 09-10 version of Kidd best for this format. There are so many good version of him though and it sounds like you are going with a good one for your version of the team.