POLITICS DAILY PLUS - 1 Topic

The Obama Iran Deal Gets Curiouser and Curiouser

Jun 6, 2018

RUSH: So I’m doing show prep today and I run across this little headline that the Obama administration gave Iran access to the U.S. financial system. And I said, “Well, now, what is that?” So I endeavored to dig into this.

Now, the timing of this is somewhat interesting as well. We’re in the midst of the left and the Democrats, while the Obama legacy is being whittled away and erased, there are a number of Obamaites that are doing their best to restructure it and to try to remind everybody how wonderful Obama was, and Obama was a citizen of the world, and the world was safer, America was greater, and all these things.

And the Obama people loved to run around and say, “We never had a scandal. The Obama administration was one of the few ever that was scandal free.” So I looked into this. It’s a Fox News story. If I were to read the story to you, believe me, you would think we’re in the weeds here after not too much time. So let me summarize what this story says.

In 2016, a bank in Oman had $5.7 billion worth of Iranian assets in rials, the currency. The Iranians wanted the rials converted to euros. So the Obama Treasury department issued a special license to the bank in Oman to allow that, but they still needed a U.S. bank to convert. But there were U.S. sanctions in place, and those sanctions prohibited American banks from doing anything that aided Iran financially.

But that didn’t stop the Obama Regime. The Obama Regime asked two banks to go ahead and convert the rials to euros, which is what the Iranians wanted. But these banks still refused. These two banks stood up to Obama and they said, “No. We’re not gonna do this.” So Obama then arranged for the $5.7 billion worth of Iranian assets in rials to be converted to euros.

In other words, this was money that was Irans, it was frozen, it was theirs, they wanted it back, and Obama endeavored to get it back to them, in spite of sanctions. And he ordered a couple of American banks to violate sanctions to do the conversion from rials to euros, and the two banks that he hit up refused. So he went to European banks, who willingly did what Obama wanted to do because, of course, there’s nobody greater than Obama.

The scandal in all of this is the U.S. gave a license to this bank in Oman, in the middle of sanctions on Iran, the Obama administration granted a license to this Oman bank to start moving the Iranian money around. Number two. They tried to get two U.S. banks to break the law by ignoring U.S. sanctions, which prohibited Iran from accessing the U.S. financial system.

In other words, for Iran to get that $5.7 billion, the U.S. financial system would have to be involved. Sanctions prohibited this. Obama made it happen. This is 2016. This is right in the timeline with the Iranian nuclear deal. There is a Republican investigation that’s uncovered all of this and the Obama administration lied to Congress about it. They misled Congress on possible Iranian access to the U.S. financial system.

This is in addition to Obama coming up with a bunch of millions of dollars in euros in cash that he delivered to the Tehran airport on pallets that was ostensibly ransom payment to get American hostages released. And as time goes on, everybody is beginning to wonder, what in the world was it about Iran and Obama? Why in the world was Obama so interested in helping them?

He facilitated their acquisition of nuclear power by virtue of the Iran deal. He signed the Iran — he didn’t sign it. The Iran deal has never been signed, never been verified, it doesn’t obligate the United States any way. It’s why Trump was so easily able to withdraw from it. The Iranians never signed it.

Now, the companion story is that the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini said Iran is set to boost the enrichment capacity of their nuclear operation if the nuclear deal flounders. So here you have one of the mullahs essentially saying, “Yeah, we are gonna go ahead and enrich. We’re gonna start our centrifuges, and we’re gonna up our capacity, especially if you pull out of the deal.”

Iran’s top leader said Monday he had ordered preparations to increase uranium enrichment capacity if the nuclear deal with world powers falls apart after the U.S. withdrawal. He vowed never to accept limits on Tehran’s ballistic missile program. Let me give you a hint: He didn’t accept limits on it during the Iran deal with Obama, either. That was not even a deal. It was curious.

The Obama administration, maybe Obama personally, had some stake in Iran strengthening itself. And now this bit about being able to access the U.S. financial system in violation of sanctions with the Obama administration trying to lead the way to make that happen, it just gets curiouser and curiouser and curiouser.


Related Links

6/10/2018 10:20 AM

Sunday, June 10



Trump's Blasts Upend G7, Alienating Oldest Allies

Baker & Shear, New York Times
Elites Scream Over Trump's G7 Criticism. That's the Point!

Steve Hilton, FOX News
Can Trump Make Pivot From Disruptor to Dealmaker?

Dan Balz, Washington Post
The Weakening Blue Wave

Sean Trende, New York Daily News
Mindless Tribalism Infecting American Politics

Josh Kraushaar, National Journal
NY Times Reporter Broke the Biggest Rule in Journalism

Michael Goodwin, NY Post
We Need Federal Shield Law Now to Protect Journalists

Gabe Rottman, Daily Beast
Leaks Investigations, Journalists, and Double Standards

Andrew McCarthy, NRO
Bill's Belated #MeToo Moment

Maureen Dowd, New York Times
Why Can't We Hate Men?

Suzanna Danuta Walters, Washington Post
New Leak Indictment Spells Disaster for McCabe

Jonathan Turley, The Hill
A Democrat Dissents on the Mueller Probe

Jason Willick, Wall Street Journal
How Orwell Predicted the Challenge of Writing Today

Masha Gessen, The New Yorker
Crisis at the National Archives

Thomas Lipscomb, RealClearPolitics
We Beg Your Pardons, Mr. President

Carl M. Cannon, Orange County Register
We're Depressed & Suicidal Because Our Culture Is Broken

Kirsten Powers, USAT
A Few Words on Charles Krauthammer

Kathleen Parker, Washington Post

Editorials


Russia, Not Trump, Is Enemy of Democracy

Boston Herald
Trump Must Get North Korea to Come Completely Clean

Washington Post
African-Americans and the Strains of the National Anthem

New York Times
Mayor's Promise to End Stop-and-Frisk Got Arrested

Philadelphia Inquirer
6/10/2018 10:25 AM

JUNE 11, 2018 — SCOTT JOHNSON

IN SINGAPORE, A WHITE HOUSE STATEMENT

The White House has released the statement below about the Singapore summit meeting tomorrow (embedded below via the Twitter feed of AP White House correspondent Zeke Miller). The statement relates: “The discussions between the United States and North Korea are ongoing and have moved more quickly than expected.” The summit will convene and adjourn in Singapore in the course of the coming day. Something is happening here. White House: Statement »
JUNE 11, 2018 — SCOTT JOHNSON

SENATOR GRASSLEY REQUESTS (AGAIN)

I will try to omit continued professions of difficulty keeping up with the true scandals surrounding the fabricated scandal of Trump-Russia collusion, or of disbelief over the bureaucratic obstruction that amounts to defiance when oversight beckons. In the spirit of Ciceronian praeteritio and rhetorical disgust, I wonder how long the authorities at the Department of Justice can abuse the patience of the Senate with their continued resistance? We have grown »
6/11/2018 2:49 PM
Liberals Ought to Learn From Kim Kardashian

Karol Markowicz, New York Post
6/11/2018 2:50 PM
6/11/2018 3:25 PM
6/11/2018 6:42 PM
Very likely this is Krauthammer's finest post. It was during Bush 41's administration, in response to the outrage from Democrats to Dick Cheney's cursing on the Senate floor. This is funny ****.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A22191-2004Jul1.html?noredirect=on
6/11/2018 7:48 PM
6/11/2018 8:32 PM


RUSH: There’s trouble brewing at the Amazon Prime/Washington Post. It’s big trouble.

More than 400 employees of the Drive-By-Media giant have written to the boss, Jeff Bezos, demanding that he fork over higher pay and better benefits.

A labor dispute has been raging inside the newspaper for a year, pitting management against the union that represents over 800 editorial and business employees. Now the dispute has gone public.

According to the open letter, Bezos offered the Amazon Prime/Post workers a pitiful ten-dollar-a-week raise. They were insulted, especially since Bezos is one of the richest men in the world. They claim digital subscriptions are way up, online traffic is way up, and advertising is meeting goals.

So the employees want “fairness.” More money, more family leave, better health benifits, more retirement income, and more job security.

They want more of everything.

Mr. Bezos. Maybe there’s a way out of this mess. How about offering your disgruntled staff at the Amazon Prime/Washington Post a bigger discount at Amazon Prime/Whole Foods? Maybe with a minimum purchase, of course.

After all, it’s only money! But you never know what can satisfy angry liberals that won’t cost you very much.


Related Links

6/23/2018 6:49 PM
WHAT'S TODAYS EMERGENCY?

We have the answers.
7/2/2018 3:05 PM
7/7/2018 9:32 PM
7/8/2018 3:57 PM
7/8/2018 4:51 PM
◂ Prev 12345 Next ▸
POLITICS DAILY PLUS - 1 Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2024 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.