This ranking takes a look at turnover, wait time between seasons, and several factors that determine a "parity score".
The first set of numbers represent the raw data for each world and then the second set is that world's "score" for each category.
Category scores are determined by that world's distance from the "baseline world" in each category.
A baseline world is defined as the world with the best raw data in that particular category.
Below is a legend for the abbreviations in the chart:
TO = Turnover. How many total owners have been replaced over the last 4 seasons.
Baseline - 3 - BBWAA
Wait = Wait time between seasons. This number equals how many days longer than 360 the world took to complete 4 seasons.
Baseline - 4 - The MLB/Cooperstown
PO = Playoffs. How many different franchises have appeared in the playoffs over the last 4 seasons.
Baseline - 27 - Happy Jack/Boggs
WS = World Series. How many different teams have made it to the World Series over the last 4 seasons.
Baseline - 8 - 10 tied
100W = How many 100 win + teams during the last 4 seasons.
Baseline - 2 - Cooperstown
100L = How many 100 loss + teams during the last 4 seasons.
Baseline - 4 - Cooperstown/Addicted Users
110W = How many 110 win + teams during the last 4 seasons.
Baseline - 0 - 20 tied
110L = How many 110 loss + teams during the last 4 seasons.
Baseline - 0 - 21 tied
Most W = Most wins by any one team, during any single season, over the last 4 seasons.
Baseline - 101 - Capra
Most L = Most losses by any one team, during any single season, over the last 4 seasons.
Baseline - 101 - Cooperstown
Real Life MLB (2014-2017)
Playoffs |
WS |
100 W |
100 L |
110 W |
110 L |
MOST W |
MOST L |
21 |
7 |
5 |
1 |
0 |
|
104 |
102 |
EDIT: It should be noted that in the "Most W and Most L" column, the actual highest and lowest number for each world was dropped so that one outlier in a skewed season didn't negatively impact a world too badly. That is why you might see a world scored with one instance of having had a team win or lose 110+ but their "Most W" or "Most L" might show a number below that.
I thought this to be a good revision, since looking at the last rankings I thought it may have skewed the numbers too strongly.
Conversely if a world's "Most W" or "Most L" category STILL shows 120+ that means that there was a team not reflected who had an even more absurd figure. Which is pretty telling IMO.
5/30/2018 10:08 AM (edited)