Its All Trumps Fault Topic

Posted by strikeout26 on 9/19/2018 5:27:00 PM (view original):
Posted by tangplay on 9/19/2018 5:19:00 PM (view original):
Posted by strikeout26 on 9/19/2018 4:45:00 PM (view original):
If you can feed your family, you're not poor. Tang, you may want venture out of Central Kansas and into a 3rd world country. Start telling them that people with luxuries like cable tv are poor and see what kind of reaction you get.
We have a different definition of what poor means. You can feed your family and still be poor.
So enlighten us on what it means to not be poor.
The current poverty line, as defined by the US department of health and human services, is as follows:
1 $12,140
2 $16,460
3 $20,780
4 $25,100
5 $29,420
6 $33,740
7 $38,060
8 $42,380

(Persons in family, income)
9/19/2018 5:40 PM
So, an arbitrary number is how you determine if someone is poor or not? Do you let the government tell you when to go to the bathroom too or just who is poor?
9/19/2018 5:42 PM
Posted by dino27 on 9/19/2018 5:02:00 PM (view original):
if there were less dems we would have less poor.....we would also have less people.
It’s fewer not less. Learn grammar. Better yet just go away.
9/19/2018 5:52 PM
I will go with the government's numbers, yes. I don't think that being told who is poor is trampling on my rights.
9/19/2018 5:52 PM
Posted by laramiebob on 9/19/2018 5:33:00 PM (view original):
Posted by all3 on 9/19/2018 4:50:00 PM (view original):
Tang, just once, please explain to us how a person can have an iPhone, Jordans and a Playstation and still be poor, without being either stupid and/or irresponsible. I think we'd love to hear how you think that's possible.
I'm glad I decided to open this one. I think I know the answer to this and bet Tangy don't.............

Here's how that's possible............ it's called theft.
No no Tang says these people can get these items lawfully and still be “poor”. He needs to stop back pedaling and defend this absurd assertion.
9/19/2018 5:53 PM
Trampling on your rights, no. Showing an inability to think critically, yes!
9/19/2018 5:53 PM
Posted by cccp1014 on 9/19/2018 5:53:00 PM (view original):
Posted by laramiebob on 9/19/2018 5:33:00 PM (view original):
Posted by all3 on 9/19/2018 4:50:00 PM (view original):
Tang, just once, please explain to us how a person can have an iPhone, Jordans and a Playstation and still be poor, without being either stupid and/or irresponsible. I think we'd love to hear how you think that's possible.
I'm glad I decided to open this one. I think I know the answer to this and bet Tangy don't.............

Here's how that's possible............ it's called theft.
No no Tang says these people can get these items lawfully and still be “poor”. He needs to stop back pedaling and defend this absurd assertion.
They can as long as they fall under a random number that the government sets, because the US government is ALWAYS right.
9/19/2018 5:55 PM
Posted by cccp1014 on 9/19/2018 5:53:00 PM (view original):
Posted by laramiebob on 9/19/2018 5:33:00 PM (view original):
Posted by all3 on 9/19/2018 4:50:00 PM (view original):
Tang, just once, please explain to us how a person can have an iPhone, Jordans and a Playstation and still be poor, without being either stupid and/or irresponsible. I think we'd love to hear how you think that's possible.
I'm glad I decided to open this one. I think I know the answer to this and bet Tangy don't.............

Here's how that's possible............ it's called theft.
No no Tang says these people can get these items lawfully and still be “poor”. He needs to stop back pedaling and defend this absurd assertion.
It is possible for someone to own all of those items and be below the poverty line.
9/19/2018 5:56 PM
Posted by strikeout26 on 9/19/2018 5:54:00 PM (view original):
Trampling on your rights, no. Showing an inability to think critically, yes!
I have used up all my critical thinking for today.
9/19/2018 5:56 PM
Posted by tangplay on 9/19/2018 5:56:00 PM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 9/19/2018 5:53:00 PM (view original):
Posted by laramiebob on 9/19/2018 5:33:00 PM (view original):
Posted by all3 on 9/19/2018 4:50:00 PM (view original):
Tang, just once, please explain to us how a person can have an iPhone, Jordans and a Playstation and still be poor, without being either stupid and/or irresponsible. I think we'd love to hear how you think that's possible.
I'm glad I decided to open this one. I think I know the answer to this and bet Tangy don't.............

Here's how that's possible............ it's called theft.
No no Tang says these people can get these items lawfully and still be “poor”. He needs to stop back pedaling and defend this absurd assertion.
It is possible for someone to own all of those items and be below the poverty line.
Which proves that the "poverty line" is not a great indicator of whose poor.
9/19/2018 5:58 PM
Well the guidelines I cited are used for determining who gets governmental programs...

But I think that whole argument is a non-sequiter.
9/19/2018 6:02 PM
Posted by cccp1014 on 9/19/2018 5:52:00 PM (view original):
Posted by dino27 on 9/19/2018 5:02:00 PM (view original):
if there were less dems we would have less poor.....we would also have less people.
It’s fewer not less. Learn grammar. Better yet just go away.
in your case you are an example of a less person.
9/19/2018 6:30 PM
Posted by dino27 on 9/19/2018 6:30:00 PM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 9/19/2018 5:52:00 PM (view original):
Posted by dino27 on 9/19/2018 5:02:00 PM (view original):
if there were less dems we would have less poor.....we would also have less people.
It’s fewer not less. Learn grammar. Better yet just go away.
in your case you are an example of a less person.
Isn't that the kind of comment you so adamantly claimed had no place in these threads?
Nice to see you didn't lost any of your hypocrisy while you were gone.
Might be best if you made a new "safe" thread for yourself.
9/19/2018 8:20 PM
Posted by dino27 on 9/19/2018 6:30:00 PM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 9/19/2018 5:52:00 PM (view original):
Posted by dino27 on 9/19/2018 5:02:00 PM (view original):
if there were less dems we would have less poor.....we would also have less people.
It’s fewer not less. Learn grammar. Better yet just go away.
in your case you are an example of a less person.
Are you still here? Go away Captain Censor. You have lost all credibility here. You Traitor.
9/19/2018 9:03 PM
Posted by all3 on 9/19/2018 8:20:00 PM (view original):
Posted by dino27 on 9/19/2018 6:30:00 PM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 9/19/2018 5:52:00 PM (view original):
Posted by dino27 on 9/19/2018 5:02:00 PM (view original):
if there were less dems we would have less poor.....we would also have less people.
It’s fewer not less. Learn grammar. Better yet just go away.
in your case you are an example of a less person.
Isn't that the kind of comment you so adamantly claimed had no place in these threads?
Nice to see you didn't lost any of your hypocrisy while you were gone.
Might be best if you made a new "safe" thread for yourself.
Thank you
9/19/2018 9:03 PM
◂ Prev 1...14|15|16|17|18...28 Next ▸
Its All Trumps Fault Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2024 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.